Duty to give assistance and provide information
regulation 9(4) of The Spirit Drinks Regulations 2008
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
4 Any person who contravenes paragraph (3) is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Legal burden on the defendant
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision gives a defence the defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities. A legal burden of that kind can be read down to a merely evidential one under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 where placing it on the defendant would be disproportionate (R v Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; Sheldrake v DPP [2004] UKHL 43).
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
The defence, as drafted
21 1 It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under these Regulations to prove that they took all reasonable steps and exercised all due diligence to avoid committing the offence. 2 A may not rely on a defence that involves an allegation that the commission of the offence was due to the act or default of B unless— a at least seven clear
What would breach regulation 9(4)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person contravenes paragraph (3).
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Spirit Drinks Regulations 2008, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 15 December 2008
- In force from
- 16 January 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make provision for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ No L 39, 13.2.2008, p 16) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89, and give enforcement authorities new powers in relation to the enforcement of EC requirements relating to spirit drinks, including the power to give improvement notices and to impose monetary penalties by penalty notice. These Regulations revoke the Spirit Drinks Regulations 1990 (S.I. 1990/1179), the Spirit Drinks (Scotland) Regulations 1990 (S.I. 1990/1196 (S. 136)), the Spirit Drinks Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1990 (S.R. (NI) 1990 No 219), the Spirit Drinks (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995/484 (S. 33)), the Spirit Drinks (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995/732) and the Spirit Drinks (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (S.R. (NI) 1995 No 105) (regulation 2 and Schedule 1). The 1990 Regulations, as amended, made provision for the enforcement of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 (OJ No L 160, 12.6.1989, p 1) laying down general rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1014/90 (OJ No L 105, 25.4.1990, p 9) laying down detailed implementing rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks. Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 supersedes those EC Regulations. These Regulations include provisions making the failure to comply with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 mentioned in Schedule 2 an offence and create an additional offence to protect geographical indications registered in Annex III to that Regulation (regulation 4 and Schedule 2). They designate the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs as the verification authority for the purpose of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (regulation 5). They designate food authorities and port health authorities as the competent authorities for the purpose of Article 24(1) of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (regulation 6) and for the enforcement of the Regulations (regulation 7). They provide for the appointment of officers (regulation 8). They impose a duty on competent authorities and enforcement authorities to give assistance and information to each other and empower the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs to disclose information to an enforcement authority for the purposes of these Regulations (regulation 9). They confer powers of entry (regulation 10) and other powers (regulation 11), including seizure powers, including the seizure of products liable to destruction. They require certain procedures to be followed in the event of any exercise of the seizure powers (regulation 12). They provide for the issue of improvement notices (regulation 13) and provide for appeals against improvement notices (regulations 14 and 15). They provide for the destruction of seized products and the giving of improvement notices to be publicised (regulation 16). They make obstruction an offence (regulation 17) and provide for the punishment of criminal offences (regulation 18). They also contain provisions relating to offences committed by a body corporate, unincorporated body or partnership (regulation 19), the commission of an offence due to the act or default of a third person (regulation 20) and defences (regulation 21). These Regulations also create a scheme for the issuing and payment of penalty notices for certain offences. They include provisions relating to the giving of a penalty notice (regulation 22 and Schedule 3), the content of such a notice (regulation 23), the amount of a penalty payable under a penalty notice (regulation 24 and Schedule 4), the period in which a penalty must be paid and the effect of paying a penalty (regulation 25), the method of paying a penalty (regulation 26), the issue of a certificate relating to the payment or non-payment of a penalty (regulation 27), the payment of penalties into the Consolidated Fund (regulation 28), and the withdrawal of a penalty notice (regulation 29). They also contain provisions relating to the giving of notices (regulation 30). A full impact assessment of the effect that these Regulations will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available at www.defra.gov.uk or from Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR. It is also annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum for these Regulations, which is available, alongside these Regulations, on the OPSI website (www.opsi.gov.uk ).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Powers of an authorised officerregulation 11(3)
- Powers of an authorised officerregulation 11(8)
- Improvement noticesregulation 13(2)
- Obstructionregulation 17
- Defencesregulation 21(3)(c)
- Compliance with Community provisionsregulation 4(1)
- Compliance with Community provisionsregulation 4(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Spirit Drinks Regulations 2008 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted salesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2008