Freezing prohibitions: offences
article 5(1) of The Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008
- Revoked
- Strict liability
- Terrorism, official secrets and national security
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 A person who fails to comply with
a prohibition imposed by article
4 commits an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 5(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person fails to comply with a prohibition imposed by article 4.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Landsbanki Freezing (Revocation) Order 2009
- Revoked on
- 15 June 2009
- Made
- 8 October 2008
- In force from
- 8 October 2008
- Extent
- E+W+S+NI
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order is made under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (c.24) to give effect to a freeze on funds in relation to the Icelandic bank Landsbanki, including those owned, held or controlled in relation to that bank by the relevant Icelandic Authorities or the Government of Iceland. Article 3 provides that a specified person may request the reason why it is specified. Article 4 prohibits any person from making funds available to or for the benefit of a specified person. It also makes provision that a specified person must not deal with funds it controls, holds or owns. Article 5 makes it an offence to breach the prohibition on making funds available or to engage in activity knowing or intending that it will enable or facilitate the commission of such an offence, subject to a defence based on no knowledge or reasonable suspicion of the relevant circumstances. Article 6 provides for the Treasury to be able to grant licences to disapply the prohibitions and article 7 makes provision in relation to licensing procedure. Article 8 gives effect to the Schedule which makes provision about information and disclosure of information. Article 9 sets the penalties for offences under the Order, article 10 makes provision relating to criminal proceedings and article 11 relates to offences by bodies corporate. Article 12 makes provision about the service of notices. Article 13 confirms that the Order binds the Crown, but that the Crown is not to be held criminally liable in relation to the provisions of the Order. An Impact Assessment of the effect of this instrument on the costs to business has been prepared. It may be obtained from the Financial Stability Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. It is also available on HM Treasury’s website (www.hm-treasury.gov.uk ). Copies of the document have been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Standing Orders Etc. (Energy and Climate Change)
Commons · 28 October 2008 · Chris Bryant
I have been listening to the debate tonight, so pressing me to produce an action plan now is going a little far, but this is something that I think we need to address. The hon. Gentleman will be able to judge me by not just my words but my actions at a later stage. The hon. Member for Caernarfon (Hywel Williams) spoke of the need for minority parties to be represented on the Committee. I am minded to resist…
-
Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008
Lords · 28 October 2008 · The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Myners)
rose to move, That the order laid before the House on 8 October be approved. The noble Lord said: My Lords, before I turn to the two instruments that we are considering this evening, I should like to say a few words of a personal nature. It is a very great honour for me to stand before your Lordships for the first time in this House. I want to begin by thanking the whole House for the warm welcome that I have…
- Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008 Lords · 28 October 2008
-
Icelandic Banking Collapse
Commons · 6 November 2008 · The Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Ian Pearson)
I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Wakefield (Mary Creagh) on securing this Adjournment debate. I am sure that the whole House will have sympathy for the plight of her constituents. Let me say in advance that, although she was generous in giving way, I do not intend to give way during my reply, given the time constraints. The Icelandic economy has experienced increasing difficulties in recent months.…
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person who engages in an activity knowing or intending that it will enable or facilitate the commission by…article 5(2)
- Licensing procedurearticle 7(5)
- Licensing procedurearticle 7(6)
- 1 A person who— a fails without reasonable excuse to provide information, or to produce a document, in…paragraph 6(1) of SCHEDULE
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Terrorism, official secrets and national securityOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2008