Removal and resignation of auditors
article 6(2) of The Building Societies Act 1986 (Accounts, Audit and EEA State Amendments) Order 2008 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
6 If that person is
a firm an offence is committed by—
a the firm, and
b every officer of the firm who is in default.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an officer
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an officer meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 6(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Building Societies Act 1986 (Accounts, Audit and EEA State Amendments) Order 2008, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 11 June 2008
- In force from
- 29 June 2008
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order ) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order amends the Building Societies Act 1986 (“the 1986 Act”) to implement, in relation to building societies: a Parts of Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory audits of annual accounts (amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC) (O.J. L 157, 9.6.2006, p.87), and b Parts of Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions (O.J. L 224, 16.8.2006, p.7). The Order also makes an amendment to the definition of “EEA State” in section 97 of the 1986 Act. The existing definition of “EEA State” excludes Bulgaria and Romania, which became Community member States on 1st January 2007. The new definition refers to the definition of “EEA State” in the Interpretation Act 1978 (c.30), which was inserted into that Act by the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 (c.51). It therefore includes all Community member States. Article 3 of the Order inserts a new section 72L into the 1986 Act, requiring building societies to give certain information relating to off-balance-sheet arrangements in the notes to their annual accounts. Article 4, and Schedule 1, amend the requirements in the 1986 Act on the disclosure of auditor remuneration. Article 5 substitutes new sections 78A to 78D for section 78A of the 1986 Act. The new provisions relate to the signature of the auditor’s report, the publication of auditors’ names in the report and the circumstances in which they may be omitted. Article 6 amends Schedule 11 to the 1986 Act. New paragraph 6A gives members of the society, and the Financial Services Authority, the right to apply to the High Court (or in Scotland, the Court of Session) for an order giving relief in respect of the removal of an auditor on improper grounds. New paragraphs 8A to 8C require the auditor and the building society to notify the appropriate audit authority where an auditor ceases to hold office. Schedule 2 changes various references to “auditors” in the 1986 Act from plural to singular. This ensures consistency with the earlier provisions of the Order and with the Companies Act 2006 (c.46), in particular with Part 42 of that Act, which applies to building societies. Articles 3 to 5, 6(2) and 7 of the Order, and the Schedules, are made under section 104(5) of the 1986 Act (power to amend, etc to assimilate to company law). Articles 6(1) and 8 are made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 (c.68) as they do not assimilate company law. This Order only implements the parts of Directives 2006/43/EC and 2006/46/EC which require amendments to the 1986 Act. A full transposition note showing how the main provisions of the Audit and Accounts Directives (as they apply to building societies) will be transposed into UK law is available from HM Treasury. Copies may be obtained from the Savings and Investment Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business is also available from HM Treasury at the above address. Both documents are annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum which is available alongside the instrument on the OPSI website (www.opsi.gov.uk), and are available on the Treasury website (www.hm-treasury.x.gsi.gov.uk).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person ceasing to hold office as auditor who fails to comply with this paragraph commits an offencearticle 6(2)
- If a building society fails to comply with this paragraph, an offence is committed by— a the society, and b…article 6(2)
- Names to be stated in copies of auditor’s report filed or publishedarticle 78C(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.55.
- Basis
- c06_offence_committed
- Confidence
- 0.55 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Building Societies Act 1986 (Accounts, Audit and EEA State Amendments) Order 2008 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2008