UK Offence Report

Removal or resignation of auditor

article 6(2) of The Friendly Societies Act 1992 (Accounts, Audit and EEA State Amendments) Order 2008 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

5 If a person ceasing to hold office as auditor fails to comply with this paragraph, he is guilty of an offence and liable— a on conviction on indictment, to a fine, and b on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
failing to do something the instrument requires
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach article 6(2)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Not doing what the provision requires under the Friendly Societies Act 1992 (Accounts, Audit and EEA State Amendments) Order 2008, by the time it requires it to be done.
  2. Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
Maximum fine
£5,000
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
21 April 2008
In force from
29 June 2008
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Order ) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

This Order amends the Friendly Societies Act 1992 (“the 1992 Act”) to implement, in relation to friendly societies: a Parts of Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory audits of annual accounts (amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC) (O.J. L 157, 9.6.2006, p.87), and b Parts of Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions (O.J. L 224, 16.8.2006, p.7). The Order also makes an amendment to the definition of “EEA State” in section 119 of the 1992 Act. The existing definition of “EEA State” excludes Bulgaria and Romania, which became Community member States on 1st January 2007. The new definition refers to the definition of “EEA State” in the Interpretation Act 1978 (c.30), which was inserted into that Act by the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 (c.51). It therefore includes all Community member States. Article 3 of the Order inserts a new section 69L into the 1992 Act, requiring friendly societies to give certain information relating to off-balance-sheet arrangements in the notes to their annual accounts. Article 4, and Schedule 1, amend the requirements in the 1992 Act on the disclosure of auditors’ remuneration. Article 5 substitutes new sections 74 to 74C for section 74 of the 1992 Act. The new provisions relate to the signature of the auditor’s report, the publication of auditors’ names in the report and the circumstances in which they may be omitted. Article 6 amends Schedule 14 to the 1986 Act. New paragraph 10A gives members of the society, and the Financial Services Authority, the right to apply to the High Court (or in Scotland, the Court of Session) for an order giving relief in respect of the removal of an auditor on improper grounds. New paragraphs 15A to 15C require the auditor and the friendly society to notify the appropriate audit authority where an auditor ceases to hold office. Article 8 corrects a defect in the 1992 Act made by the Friendly Societies Act 1992 (International Accounting Standards and Other Accounting Amendments) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/2211). This relates to the parliamentary procedure applicable to the order-making powers in sections 69J and 69K. As the correction is made in an instrument making other amendments, this Order is not made available free of charge to those who bought the defective instrument. Schedule 2 changes various references to “auditors” in the 1992 Act from plural to singular. This ensures consistency with the amendments made by this Order and with the Companies Act 2006 (c.46), in particular with Part 42 of that Act, which applies to friendly societies which are insurers within the meaning of Council Directive 1991/674/EEC (O.J. L 374, 31.12.1991, p.7). Articles 3 to 5, 6(2), 7 to 9 and the Schedules are made under section 102 of the Friendly Societies Act 1992 (power to amend etc to assimilate to company law). Articles 6(1) and 10 are made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 (c.68) as they do not assimilate company law. This Order only implements the parts of Directives 2006/43/EC and 2006/46/EC which require amendments to the 1992 Act. A full transposition note showing how the main provisions of the Audit and Accounts Directives (as they apply to friendly societies) will be transposed into UK law is available from HM Treasury. Copies may be obtained from the Savings and Investment Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business is also available from HM Treasury at the above address. Both documents are annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum which is available alongside the instrument on the OPSI website (www.opsi.gov.uk), and are available on the Treasury website (www.hm-treasury.gov.uk).

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source