Alteration and storage of ear tags
paragraph 10(1) of SCHEDULE 1 of The Cattle Identification Regulations 2007
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlife
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 It is an offence to alter, obliterate or deface an ear tag applied under Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 or previous cattle tagging legislation, or
a temporary mark applied by an inspector in accordance with paragraph 7 (application of temporary marks).
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 10(1) of SCHEDULE 1?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words it is an offence to alter, obliterate or deface an ear tag applied under Regulation (EC) No.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Cattle Identification Regulations 2007.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
The Ministry of Justice records offences under this instrument against offence code 9554 — 09554 - Obstruction etc. under Cattle Identification Regulations 2007. That code may cover several provisions of the instrument, so a count against it is not a count of prosecutions under this provision alone.
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have their own code in the MoJ’s Outcomes by Offence data tool. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 19 February 2007
- In force from
- 6 April 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke and remake the provisions of— a the Bovine Animals (Records, Identification and Movement) Order 1995; b the Cattle Identification Regulations 1998; c the Cattle Database Regulations 1998; d the Cattle (Identification of Older Animals) Regulations 2000. together with the amendments to those instruments. The principal changes are as follows. The Regulations now allow bison to be tagged up to 9 months after birth (paragraph 1(3) of Schedule1). They create an offence of transferring eartags between animals (paragraph 4(5) of Schedule 1 and of re-using an ear tag (paragraph 4(6) of that Schedule). They no longer permit the use of temporary calf passports. They permit electronic registration of cattle (paragraph 2(3) of Schedule 2). They change the £50 fee for replacement passports to a fee reflecting the cost of issue (paragraph 4 of Schedule 3). They simplify the provisions on records (Schedule 5). The Regulations enforce— Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council (establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 820/97); Commission Regulation (EC) No. 494/98 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 820/97 as regards the application of minimum administrative sanctions in the framework of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals; Commission Regulation (EC) No. 911/2004 (implementing Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards ear tags, passports and holding registers);and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 644/2005 (authorising a special identification system for bovine animals kept for cultural and historical purposes on approved premises as provided for in Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council). They provide for notification of a holding to the Secretary of State if cattle are kept there (regulation 3). They make provision for eartags (regulation 4 and Schedule 1), registration of cattle (regulation 5 and Schedule 2), passports (regulation 6 and Schedule 3) and notification of movement and death (regulation 7 and Schedule 4). They provide for records to be kept in the form specified in Schedule 5. They provide for the enforcement of the Regulations (Part 4). They are enforced by the local authority (regulation 16). Breach of the Regulations is an offence, punishable— a on summary conviction, by a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment not exceeding three months or to both; b on conviction on indictment, by a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available at www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/cattle-cir/index.htm.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Delegated legislation
Commons · 8 May 2007
That the Cattle Identification Regulations 2007 (S.I., 2007, No. 529), dated 19 th February 2007, be referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee.— [Liz Blackman.]
Other offences in the same instrument
- Registrationparagraph 1 of SCHEDULE 2
- Making a recordparagraph 1(1) of SCHEDULE 5
- Enforcement of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000paragraph 1(4) of SCHEDULE 1
- Alteration and storage of ear tagsparagraph 10(2) of SCHEDULE 1
- Imported cattleparagraph 12(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Exportsparagraph 13(1) of SCHEDULE 3
- Exportsparagraph 13(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Markets and animal gatheringsparagraph 14(1) of SCHEDULE 3
- Retention of cattle passportsparagraph 2(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Movement from a holdingparagraph 3(1) of SCHEDULE 1
- Movement from a holdingparagraph 3(2) of SCHEDULE 1
- Movement from a holdingparagraph 3(4) of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.90.
- Basis
- the provision says “it is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.90 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Cattle Identification Regulations 2007 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlifeOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007