UK Offence Report

Offences and penalties

regulation 39(1)(c) of The Official Feed and Food Controls (England) Regulations 2007 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

c to the extent that contravention or failure to comply with regulation

28 does not constitute an offence under regulation 38, contravenes or fails to comply with regulation 28; or

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
contravening a requirement of the instrument
Fault element
Mixed — some elements strict, some not
Burden of proof
Legal burden on the defendant

The prosecution must prove the conduct, and - for those elements the provision qualifies (intentionally) - the state of mind it names. The remaining elements carry no fault requirement, so they are strict.

The provision gives a defence the defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities. A legal burden of that kind can be read down to a merely evidential one under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 where placing it on the defendant would be disproportionate (R v Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; Sheldrake v DPP [2004] UKHL 43).

Classifier’s reasoning: the offence itself carries no fault word, but a duty it criminalises by cross-reference uses intentionally; which element that governs was not determined.

The defence, as drafted

paragraph(2), be a defence for the accused to prove that he took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence by himself or by a person under his control. 2 If in any case the defence provided by paragraph (1) involves the allegation that the commission of the offence was due to an act or default of another person, or to relianc

What would breach regulation 39(1)(c)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Official Feed and Food Controls (England) Regulations 2007, whatever the reason for doing it.
  2. Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
Maximum fine
£5,000
Standard scale
Level 5
Maximum prison (summary)
3 months
Maximum prison (on indictment)
2 years

this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2007-12-14); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
6 November 2007
In force from
14 December 2007
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations revoke and re-enact with changes the Official Feed and Food Controls (England) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/15). The principal changes are that — it is provided that the introduction into England of certain feed and food products is prohibited and that a person who contravenes such a prohibition is guilty of an offence; it is provided that an authorised officer of an enforcement authority must serve a notice when he proposes to place a consignment of feed or food under official detention— in case of suspicion of non-compliance or because there is doubt as to the identity or the destination of the consignment, or because the feed or food does not comply with feed or food law; it is provided that a person who contravenes or fails to comply with certain obligations relating to the checking of products that are introduced into England is guilty of an offence; it is provided that expenses may be charged by competent authorities where they arise from additional official controls or arise in respect of co-ordinated assistance and follow-up by the European Commission; and the definitions of “relevant feed law” and “relevant food law” in Schedules 2 and 3 respectively are revised. These Regulations which, like S.I. 2006/15, apply in relation to England only, provide for the execution and enforcement there of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ No.L165, 30.4.2004, p.1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1791/2006 (OJ No. L363, 20.12.2006, p.1), in relation to “relevant feed law” and “relevant food law”, which terms are defined in Schedules 2 and 3 respectively. The revised text of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 is now set out in a Corrigendum (OJ No. L191, 28.5.2004, p.1), which should be read with a further Corrigendum (OJ No. L204, 4.8.2007, p.29). These Regulations also impose prohibitions on the introduction of certain feed and food into England in the light of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No.178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ No.L31, 1.2.2002, p.1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No.575/2006 (OJ No.L100, 8.4.2006, p.3) and as read with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ No. L139, 30.4.2004, p.1; the revised text of that Regulation is now set out in a Corrigendum, OJ No. L226, 25.6.2004, p.3, which should be read with a further Corrigendum, OJ No. L204, 4.8.2007, p.26). These Regulations — provide for the designation of specified bodies as competent authorities for the purposes of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (regulation 3); provide for the exchange and provision of information by competent authorities (regulation 4); enable a competent authority to require a control body to provide information and make records available and provide that a person who – fails to comply with a requirement to provide information or make records available, or in purported compliance with such a requirement furnishes false or misleading information, is guilty of an offence (regulation 5); enable the Secretary of State to issue codes of recommended practice to feed authorities and food authorities (regulation 6); give the Food Standards Agency the function of monitoring the performance of enforcement authorities in enforcing certain legislation (regulation 7); give the Food Standards Agency the power, for the purpose of carrying out the function referred to in sub–paragraph (e) of this paragraph — to require information to be provided and records to be made available (regulation8), and to authorise individuals (who may thereby exercise certain powers, including a power of entry) (regulation 9); define certain terms used in regulations 7 to 9 (regulation 10); provide that a person who — obstructs a person exercising a power to enter premises, take samples or inspect and copy records, fails to comply with a requirement to provide information, make records available or provide facilities, records, information or other assistance, or is guilty of an offence (regulation 11); provide a right of appeal in respect of a decision of the competent authority concerning the approval of certain establishments taken under Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (regulations 12 and 13); provide that an authorised officer of a competent authority may take with him a member of staff of the competent authority of another member State for the purpose of conducting an administrative enquiry under Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (regulation14); provide that when an “enforcing officer”, defined in regulation 15(2), enters premises for the purpose of executing and enforcing official controls he may take with him a Commission expert to enable that expert to carry out functions under Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (regulation 15); provide that a person who enters premises under the powers referred to in sub–paragraph (j) or (k) of this paragraph and discloses any information obtained on the premises with regard to any trade secret is guilty of an offence unless he does so in the performance of his duty (regulation 16); specify the authorities that are responsible for executing and enforcing regulations 5(3), 9(8), 11, 16, 18(8) and 19 (regulation 17); give powers of entry to authorised officers of the authorities referred to in sub–paragraph (m) of this paragraph (regulation 18); create the offence of obstructing an officer acting in the execution of regulation 14, 15 or 18 (regulation 19); provide penalties for offences under Part 2 of these Regulations (regulation 20); provide a time limit for bringing prosecutions for offences under regulation 18(8) (regulation 21); make provision for the execution and enforcement of Part 3 of these Regulations and Articles 15 to 24 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004, together defined in regulation2(1) as “the Import Provisions” (regulations 23 and 24); provide that the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs are to carry out the functions given to customs services under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (regulation 25). make provision for the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions to be deferred until a product reaches its destination (regulation 26); in the light of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 as read with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 (as described in paragraph 3 above) prohibit the introduction into England of certain feed and food unless specified conditions are met (regulation 27); provide for the checking of products that are introduced into England (regulation 28); provide that an enforcement authority, first, has the power to do anything that a competent authority may do under Articles 18 to 21 and 24(3) of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 and, second, is the competent authority for the purposes of Article 22 of that Regulation (regulation29); provide for the service of notices by an authorised officer of an enforcement authority when he proposes to take certain measures or exercise certain powers under Articles 18 and 19 of Regulation (EC) No.882/2004 (imports of feed and food from third countries) (regulation 30); provide a right of appeal in respect of the service of notices under regulation 30 (regulations31 and 32); enable the Secretary of State or the Agency by written declaration to suspend, or impose conditions on, the introduction into England of any product from a third country where they learn or reasonably suspect that any food or feed that has been or may be introduced into England from that third country is likely to constitute a serious risk to animal or public health (regulation 33); provide that the costs incurred by the enforcement authority for which the feed or food business operator or its representative is liable under Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (costs incurred by competent authority for the activities referred to in Articles 18 to 21 of that Regulation) are payable by the feed or food business operator or its representative (regulation 34); provide for the procurement and analysis of samples of food for the purposes of the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions (regulations 35 and 36); provide powers of entry for authorised officers of food authorities in relation to the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions (regulation 37); create the offence of obstructing an officer acting in the execution of the Import Provisions (regulation 38); create offences consisting of contravening or failing to comply with specified regulations and failing to comply with a notice served under the Import Provisions and provide penalties for offences under Part 3 of these Regulations (regulation 39); provide a time limit for bringing prosecutions for certain offences under Part 3 of these Regulations (regulation 40); provide that expenses charged by a competent authority pursuant to Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (expenses arising from additional official controls) are payable by the operator (regulation 41); provide that expenses charged by a competent authority pursuant to Article 40(4) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (expenses arising from co-ordinated assistance and follow-up by the Commission) are payable by the feed or food business (regulation 42); provide that where the commission of an offence under these Regulations is due to the act or default of some other person that other person is guilty of the offence (regulation 43); provide that in proceedings for an offence under these Regulations it is a defence for the accused to prove that he took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence (regulation 44); provide that where an offence under these Regulations which has been committed by a body corporate is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, an officer of the body corporate or a person purporting to act as such he as well as the body corporate is deemed to be guilty of that offence and may be proceeded against and punished accordingly (regulation 45); provide that where an offence under these Regulations which has been committed by a Scottish partnership is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, a partner he as well as the partnership is deemed to be guilty of that offence and may be proceeded against and punished accordingly (regulation 46); provide for the protection of officers acting in good faith (regulation 47); provide for the service of documents (regulation 48); and revoke the Official Feed and Food Controls (England) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2005/15) (regulation 49). A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available from the Food Hygiene Implementation Division of the Food Standards Agency, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London WC2B 6NH and is annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum which is available alongside the instrument on the OPSI website.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.88.

Basis
the provision says the conduct “is an offence”; the provision says the conduct “constitutes an offence”
Confidence
0.88 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source