Class of offences
paragraph 3(1)(b) of SCHEDULE 1 of The Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007
- Revoked
- Strict liability
- Miscellaneous
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
b conspiracy to commit an indictable offence contrary to section
1 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (the offence of conspiracy), incitement to commit an indictable offence and attempts to commit an indictable offence contrary to section
1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (attempting to commit an offence), fall within the same Class as the substantive offence to which they relate;
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 3(1)(b) of SCHEDULE 1?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Criminal Defence Service (Funding) (Amendment) Order 2009
- Revoked on
- 3 August 2009
- Made
- 3 April 2007
- In force from
- 30 April 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order makes provision for the funding and remuneration of services provided under Part 1 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 as part of the Criminal Defence Service. It provides that in proceedings in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal the Legal Services Commission shall fund representation in accordance with its duty under that Act. Articles 5 to 28 deal with the manner in which fees are to be claimed, determined and paid, including provisions permitting interim payments. Articles 29 to 31 provide for an appeal mechanism to challenge, in certain circumstances, the appropriate officer’s determination of the fees payable to a representative. The provisions deal with the redetermination of fees by an appropriate officer, appeals from the appropriate officer to a Costs Judge, and appeals from the Costs Judge to the High Court. Schedule 1 sets out the graduated fees and fixed fees payable to advocates for proceedings in the Crown Court. Schedule 2 sets out the fees payable to solicitors (and other appropriately qualified persons) for proceedings in the Crown Court. Schedule 3 sets out the maximum rates payable to solicitors and advocates in Very High Cost Cases. Schedule 4 sets out the manner in which fees are to be claimed, determined and paid in proceedings in the Court of Appeal. A copy of the General Criminal Contract, including the Specification to the Contract, which was published by the Commission in February 2001, is available from www.legalservices.gov.uk. A full regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Legal Aid
Lords · 19 February 2008 · Lord Thomas of Gresford
My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In doing so, I declare an interest as an advocate in criminal courts. The Question was as follows: To ask Her Majesty’s Government, following their consultation on an amendment to the Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007, what steps they will take to reform criminal legal aid.
-
Legal Aid
Lords · 19 February 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)
My Lords, the recent consultation with the General Council of the Bar and the Law Society on a proposed amendment to the Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007 closed yesterday. The proposed amendment would allow solicitors to instruct non-contracted advocates in very high-cost criminal cases, in certain circumstances. We are currently considering the responses to that consultation and will make our views…
Other offences in the same instrument
- For the purposes of this Schedule— a every indictable offence falls within the Class under which it is…paragraph 3(1) of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- MiscellaneousOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007