1 It is an offence for a person— a intentionally to obstruct an authorised person in the exercise or…
regulation 13(1) of The Controls on Dangerous Substances and Preparations Regulations 2006 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 It is an offence for
a person—
a intentionally to obstruct an authorised person in the exercise or performance of his powers or duties; or
b to make
a statement which he knows to be false or misleading in
a material particular, or recklessly makes
a statement which is false or misleading in
a material particular, where the statement is made in purported compliance with
a requirement to furnish any information imposed by or under these Regulations.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally, recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally, recklessly.
What would breach regulation 13(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Controls on Dangerous Substances and Preparations Regulations 2006.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 11 December 2006
- In force from
- 7 January 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations give effect to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain of the dangerous substances and preparations set out in Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (OJ L262, 27.9.1976, p.201), as amended. Regulation 3 restricts the marketing and use of dangerous substances and preparations, subject to various exemptions in regulations 4 to 7. Regulation 8 provides that the enforcement authorities shall enforce the restriction in regulation 3. The enforcement authorities are given in regulation 2 and are in respect of— a England and Wales, the Environment Agency; b Scotland, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; c Northern Ireland, the Department of the Environment. Regulation 9 provides that the enforcement authorities shall have the powers in Schedule 3 and may appoint persons to act on their behalf in respect of enforcement. Regulation 10 provides for the enforcement authorities to bring civil proceedings instead of proceedings for offences where the latter would afford an ineffectual remedy. Regulation 11 sets out offences in relation to the contravention of regulation 3 and regulation 12 sets out the penalties in respect of those offences. Regulation 13 sets out offences in relation to regulation 9 (powers of the enforcing authority and authorisation) and Schedule 3 (powers of entry, warrants, additional powers and notices) and regulation 14 sets out the penalties in respect of those offences. Regulation 16 provides for powers of a court to order a person to remedy matters where that person has been convicted of an offence under these Regulations. Under regulation 17, a person may appeal against an enforcement notice or prohibition notice served under Schedule 3. Regulation 18 and Schedule 4 provide for revocations and savings. Schedule 1 sets out a list of substances and preparations restricted under these Regulations. Schedule 2 sets out information that must be provided in relation to the use of leaded paint where this use is permitted under regulation 5. Schedule 3 sets out the powers of enforcement authorities. A full Regulatory Impact Assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector, and a transposition note, are available from the Chemicals and Nanotechnology Division, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 123 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6DE. Copies have been placed in the library of each House of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- It is an offence for a person— a to contravene the restriction in regulation 3; or b to contravene…regulation 11
- It is an offence for a person, without reasonable excuse— a to fail to comply with— i any requirement under…regulation 13(2)
- It is an offence for a person falsely to pretend to be an authorised personregulation 13(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.90.
- Basis
- the provision says “it is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.90 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Controls on Dangerous Substances and Preparations Regulations 2006 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2006