6 Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence and who fails to comply with any…
article 10(6) of The North Korea (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
6 Any person who has done any act under the authority of
a licence and who fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 10(6)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person has done any act under the authority of a licence and who fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the North Korea (United Nations Measures) Order 2006, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 6 months
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 1 year
the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 14 November 2006
- In force from
- 16 November 2006
- Extent
- E+W+S+NI
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order, made under section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946, gives effect in the United Kingdom to resolution 1718(2006) of the Security Council of the United Nations adopted on 14th October 2006 (“the Security Council Resolution”). Under the Security Council Resolution, the Security Council or a committee of the Security Council (the “Committee”) can designate persons in respect of whom States are to take measures to impose financial restrictions. The measures include the freezing of funds, financial assets and economic resources of such persons and ensuring that any funds, financial assets and economic resources are not made available to them or for their benefit. The Security Council and the Committee can designate persons engaged in or providing support for North Korea’s nuclear-related, other weapons of mass destruction-related and ballistic missile-related programmes, and persons acting on behalf of or at the direction of such persons. Article 3 of this Order provides that the persons designated by the Security Council, the Committee or, in accordance with article 4, the Treasury are designated persons for the purposes of the Order. Article 4 provides that the Treasury can give directions to designate persons for the purposes of the Order if one of the specified conditions is fulfilled in respect of the person. The conditions are that the Treasury have reasonable grounds to suspect that the person is or may be a person designated by the Security Council or the Committee or a person acting on behalf of or at the direction of any such person. Article 5 makes further provision about the Treasury’s directions, including a requirement for the Treasury to take the steps that they consider appropriate to publicise the direction. This article also includes provision about appeals. Article 6 prohibits any dealing with funds, financial assets and economic resources of designated persons. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 7 prohibits making funds, financial assets or economic resources available to designated persons. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 9 makes it a criminal offence to circumvent the prohibitions or to facilitate the commission of an offence relating to a prohibition. Article 10 provides a licensing procedure to enable, for humanitarian and other purposes, certain acts to be exempted from the prohibitions. Article 15 gives the Treasury power to delegate its functions under the Order. Article 17 confirms that the provisions of this Order apply to the Crown but, in the event of a contravention, the Crown is not criminally liable. The Schedule makes provision about information and evidence. A partial regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business may be obtained from the Asset Freezing Unit of the Financial Crime Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ and is also available on HM Treasury’s website (www.hm-treasury.gov.uk). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment has been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Licencesarticle 10(5)
- Freezing funds and economic resources of designated personsarticle 6(2)
- Circumventing prohibitions etcarticle 9
- A relevant institution that fails to comply with a requirement in paragraph (1) or (2) is guilty of an offenceparagraph 2(3) of SCHEDULE
- A person is guilty of an offence if he— a without reasonable excuse refuses or fails within the time and in…paragraph 4 of SCHEDULE
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The North Korea (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2006