2 A person shall be guilty of an offence if he— a dishonestly alters a certificate; or b dishonestly creates…
article 12(2) of The Plant Health (Wood Packaging Material Marking) (Forestry) Order 2006 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Summary only
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
2 A person shall be guilty of an offence if he—
a dishonestly alters
a certificate; or
b dishonestly creates an instrument which purports to be
a certificate.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (dishonestly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: dishonestly.
What would breach article 12(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Plant Health (Wood Packaging Material Marking) (Forestry) Order 2006.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2006-11-06); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 9 October 2006
- In force from
- 6 November 2006
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order implements International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures No. 15 of March 2002 on Guidelines for regulating wood packaging material in international trade, prepared by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) established by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Under the Order, no person may: apply an ISPM No. 15 mark to any wood packaging material except as authorised by a certificate issued under the Order; apply any mark other than an ISPM No. 15 mark to wood packaging material for the purpose of indicating that it has been subject to an approved measure; or, without the authorisation of the Commissioners, manufacture, remanufacture, recycle or repair any wood without first removing any existing ISPM No. 15 mark (article 3). Articles 4 to 8 provide procedures for applications for certificates, renewal of certificates and reassessment, including the fees payable in respect of those applications (which are specified in Schedule 1), and for the issue and validity of certificates. Inspectors have powers to enter premises reasonably believed to be used for the manufacture, collection, storage, trade, transportation or importation of wood packaging material and to carry out certain investigations for the purpose of ascertaining whether an approved measure has been properly carried out on wood packaging material to which an ISPM No. 15 mark has been applied, or for any other purpose of this Order, including checking compliance with it (article 9). An inspector may remove, or require another person to remove, a mark if he has reasonable grounds for suspecting that it has been applied to wood packaging material other than in accordance with this Order (article 9(4)). An inspector may also seize items he knows or suspects were used to apply a mark to wood packaging material other than in accordance with this Order, or were intended to be so used, and provision is made for claims to be made against seizure, referral to the Court and destruction of seized items (article 10). The Commissioners may, orally or in writing, withdraw a certificate issued under this Order if, in their opinion, a wood packaging material manufacturer to whom a certificate has been issued has not properly carried out an approved measure to which the certificate relates or has not complied with any provision of this Order (article 11). It is an offence: to contravene any of the provisions of article 3; to contravene a notice served under article 10(3) prohibiting the movement of seized items; intentionally to obstruct an inspector in the exercise of his powers given by this Order; knowingly or recklessly to make a false statement or intentionally to fail to disclose any material information for the purposes of procuring the issue of a certificate under this Order; to dishonestly alter a certificate; or to dishonestly create an instrument which purports to be a certificate (article 12). A person found guilty of an offence under the Order is liable on summary conviction to a fine of up to level 5 on the standard scale (article 12(8)). A Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared and placed in the Library of each House of Parliament. Copies can be obtained from the Plant Health Service of the Forestry Commission, Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person shall be guilty of an offence if, for the purposes of procuring the issue of a certificate under…article 12(1)
- A person shall be guilty of an offence if, without reasonable excuse, proof of which shall lie on him, he— a…article 12(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Plant Health (Wood Packaging Material Marking) (Forestry) Order 2006 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2006