Amendment of the Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations Etc.) Regulations 1994
regulation 3(4)(b) of The Medicines (Marketing Authorisations and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2004
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Drugs and medicines
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
b after paragraph (6) insert the following paragraph— 6A Any holder of
a United Kingdom marketing authorization who fails to forward to the licensing authority any data requested by the authority pursuant to the final paragraph of Article
23 of the 2001 Directive—
a where the licensing authority have served
a written notice on the holder under regulation 7(5) in relation to the request, within the time specified in that notice; or
b where there is no such notice, promptly, shall be guilty of an offence. .
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an licensing authority
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an licensing authority meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 3(4)(b)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Medicines (Marketing Authorisations and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2004, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Drug offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales
Covers importation, supply, production and possession of controlled drugs, with sentencing driven by drug class and the offender's role.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 7 December 2004
- In force from
- 1 January 2005
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations implement certain provisions of Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (“the 2004 Directive”) amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code for medicinal products for human use (“the 2001 Directive”), and make consequential amendments to various enactments following the adoption of Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency. The 2001 Directive is implemented in part by the Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations Etc.) Regulations 1994 (“the 1994 Regulations”). Regulation 3(2)(a)(i) and (ii) of these Regulations amends the 1994 Regulations so as to implement Article 1(21), (44), (45) and (54) of the 2004 Directive. These provisions amend the 2001 Directive so as to provide, in relation to medicinal products for human use, that– a marketing authorization holders have additional obligations to provide information and data to the competent authority (Article 1(21) of the 2004 Directive), b package leaflets accompanying such products must be drawn up in accordance with new requirements, in particular that the leaflet must reflect the results of consultations with target patient groups (Article 1(44) and (45)), and c where a change of classification of such a product has been authorised on the basis of significant pre-clinical tests or clinical trials, the competent authority may not refer to the results of those tests or trials, when examining a change of classification for the same substance within one year of the initial change (Article 1(54)). Regulation 3(4) creates new criminal offences for failures by marketing authorization holders to provide information in accordance with the requirements of the new paragraphs inserted by Article 1(21) of the 2004 Directive. Regulation 3(5) amends the 1994 Regulations so as to make transitional provision for the application of the amendments relating to package leaflets made by Article 1(44) and (45) of the 2004 Directive. These Regulations, except regulation 3(2)(a)(i) and (ii), (4) and (5), make amendments to the Terrorism Act 2000 and to various statutory instruments consequential on the coming into force of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004. This Regulation revokes and replaces Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2309/93 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Most of Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 does not apply until 20th November 2005, but Title IV came into force on 20th May 2004. Title IV provides for the establishment and constitution of the European Medicines Agency (which replaces the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products), and the constitution of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (which replace the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products and the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products, respectively). A Regulatory Impact Assessment in relation to these Regulations, and a Transposition Note in relation to the implementation of the 2004 Directive, have been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament and copies may be obtained from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Market Towers, 1 Nine Elms Lane, London SW8 5NQ.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Medicines (Marketing Authorisations and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2004 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Drugs and medicinesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2004