Offences and penalties
paragraph 9(1) of SCHEDULE 2 of The Trade in Goods (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 Any person who contravenes a prohibition in paragraph 3 or 4 shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £5,000 or the equivalent.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 9(1) of SCHEDULE 2?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person contravenes a prohibition in paragraph 3 or 4.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Trade in Goods (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 6 months
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 10 years
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 16 December 2004
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order, made under the Export Control Act 2002 (2002 c. 28) (the Act), extends with modifications the Trade in Goods (Control) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/2765) (the UK Order) to the territories listed in Schedule 1. It controls the trade between one overseas country and another of military and para-military goods and specified missiles for the time being listed in Schedule 1 to the Export of Goods, Transfer of Technology and Provision of Technical Assistance (Control) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/2764, as amended by S.I. 2004/1050, 2004/2561 and 2004/2741) as extended to those overseas territories by the Export of Goods, Transfer of Technology and Provision of Technical Assistance (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004 (S.I. 2004/3101). In this Order these goods are referred to as “controlled goods”. Further controls are imposed on “restricted goods” as listed in Schedule 4. The controls in this Order do not apply to software or technology or to activities connected to trade in controlled goods that are situated in a territory (with the exception of goods in transit via the territory). In relation to restricted goods, paragraph 3 of Schedule 2 prohibits any person within a territory, or a United Kingdom person (as defined in the Order) elsewhere, from supplying or delivering, or doing any act calculated to promote the supply or delivery of, restricted goods without a licence from the Governor (or a licence granted under any other order made under the Act). In relation to controlled goods, paragraph 4 of Schedule 2 prohibits any person in a territory from transferring, acquiring or disposing, or arranging or negotiating a contract for the acquisition or disposal, of controlled goods without a licence from the Governor (or a licence granted under any other order made under the Act). In addition, the provisions on controlled goods prohibit any person in a territory in return for a fee, commission or other consideration from doing any act or agreeing to do any act, without a licence, which would promote the arrangement or negotiation of a contract for the acquisition or disposal of controlled goods where that person knows or has reason to believe that the goods will be moved from one third country to another third country. Schedule 2 exempts persons whose sole involvement in the movement of controlled goods from one overseas country to another is to provide transport, finance, insurance or general advertising or promotion services. The remaining paragraphs in Schedule 2 do the following: Paragraphs 5-7 provide for the issuing of licences by the Governor, registration, record keeping and inspection and licence refusals and appeals; Paragraphs 8-12 provide for offences, enforcement and penalties for the breach of the controls; Paragraph 13 sets out the purposes for which information obtained by the Governor, or the customs authorities, can be disclosed; and Paragraph 14 states the address where notices to be given by any person under this Order are to be sent. Schedule 3 extends with modifications the provisions of section 9 of the Export Control Act 2002 to the territories listed in Schedule 1. Schedule 4 to this Order sets out the goods which are restricted under this Order and article 5 provides for the Governor to make modifications to Schedule 4 in the event of modifications to the Schedule to the UK Order. Schedule 5 provides for offences, enforcement and penalties for the breach of the controls in respect of the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Misleading applications for licences etcparagraph 10(1) of SCHEDULE 2
- Failure to comply with licence conditionsparagraph 11(1) of SCHEDULE 2
- Failure to comply with licence conditionsparagraph 11(1)(b) of SCHEDULE 2
- Failure to comply with licence conditionsparagraph 11(3) of SCHEDULE 2
- Any person knowingly concerned in the supply, delivery, transfer, acquisition or disposal of any restricted…paragraph 9(2) of SCHEDULE 2
- Any person knowingly concerned in the supply or delivery of any restricted goods with intent to evade any…paragraph 9(3) of SCHEDULE 2
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Trade in Goods (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2004