UK Offence Report

Failure to comply with licence conditions

paragraph 18(1) of SCHEDULE 2 of The Export of Goods, Transfer of Technology and Provision of Technical Assistance (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 Subject to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3), any person who —

a has done any act under the authority of

a licence granted by the Governor under this Order; and

b fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence, shall be guilty of an offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
failing to do something the instrument requires
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach paragraph 18(1) of SCHEDULE 2?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. On these words an offence is committed where a person a has done any act under the authority of a licence granted by the Governor under this Order; and b fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence.
  2. Not doing what the provision requires under the Export of Goods, Transfer of Technology and Provision of Technical Assistance (Control) (Overseas Territories) Order 2004, by the time it requires it to be done.
  3. Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
Maximum fine
£5,000
Maximum prison (summary)
6 months
Maximum prison (on indictment)
2 years

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
16 December 2004
In force from
Not determined
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

This Order, made under the Export Control Act 2002, extends with modifications the Export of Goods, Transfer of Technology and Provision of Technical Assistance (Control) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/2764 amended by S.I. 2004/1050, 2004/2561 and 2004/2741) (the UK Order) to the territories listed in Schedule 1. The Order establishes a new framework for the control of strategic goods, software and technology. This Order brings together controls on the export or transfer of military and dual-use goods, software and technology, controls on goods, software and technology related to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and the provision of WMD-related technical assistance. The controls in this Order apply to persons in the territories listed in Schedule 1 and in respect of certain provisions, to United Kingdom persons ordinarily resident in those territories anywhere in the world. This Order gives effect in the territories to Council Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2000 of 22 June 2000 (O.J. No. L 159, 30.06.2000 p.1.) setting up a regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology (the Regulation), as if the territories were part of the European Community. Military and para-military goods, software and technology whose export or transfer is controlled are specified in Schedule 1 to the UK Order. Dual-use goods, software and technology, the export or transfer of which are controlled, in addition to those set out in the Annexes to the Regulation, are specified in Schedule 2 to the UK Order. This Order imposes WMD end-use controls on “any relevant use” in connection with WMD. A relevant use is any use in connection with the development, production, handling, operation, maintenance, storage, detection, identification or dissemination of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or the development, production, maintenance or storage of missiles capable of delivering such weapons. The Order also introduces controls on: a the transfer by electronic means of listed military technology in Schedule 1 to the UK Order. Electronic transfer includes transfers by fax, e-mail or telephone; b the transfer by any means of technology intended for use in connection with WMD or a related missile programme. This supplements the end-use controls on the physical export of goods, software and technology and the electronic transfer of technology contained in the Regulation. This control will apply to anyone in the territories or any United Kingdom person ordinarily resident in a territory wherever located who communicates technology which the provider knows, or has been informed by a competent authority, is or might be intended for use outside the European Community and the territories in connection with WMD or missiles capable of delivering WMD; and c the provision of technical assistance in relation to WMD. This control will apply to anyone in the territories or any United Kingdom person ordinarily resident in a territory wherever located who provides or facilitates the provision of technical assistance outside the territories where he knows, or is informed by a competent authority, that it is or may be intended for use in connection with WMD or missiles capable of delivering WMD. This control, together with the WMD transfer controls, implements the European Joint Action of 22 June 2000 concerning the control of technical assistance related to certain military end-uses (2000/401/CFSP). The UK Order, as extended to the territories, is divided into six parts: Part I deals with controls on the export of military goods, dual-use goods and goods in transit with a WMD end-use; Part II deals with controls on the electronic transfer of military and dual-use technology and the transfer of technology with a WMD end-use by both electronic and non- electronic means; Part III deals with controls on the provision of WMD technical assistance; Part IV sets out exceptions to the controls in Parts I, II and III; Part V provides for the granting of licences, record keeping and appeals. Paragraph 15 sets out the procedure for appealing against any decision of the Governor to refuse, suspend or revoke any licence issued under the Order. Appeals must be made within 28 days of the date of the written notification recording the Governor’s decision; and Part VI sets out the penalties and means of enforcement for breach of the controls in the Regulation and Parts I, II and III. In paragraph 16 the maximum penalty for the intentional breach of controls on exports, transfer of technology and technical assistance is set at ten years, the maximum penalty permitted under section 7(1) of the Export Control Act 2002. Schedule 3 extends with modifications the provisions of section 9 of the Export Control Act 2002 to the territories listed in Schedule 1. Schedule 4 provides for offences, enforcement and penalties for breach of the controls in Schedule 2 in respect of the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source