UK Offence Report

Restriction on employers of relevant accession State workers requiring registration

regulation 9(1) of The Accession (Immigration and Worker Registration) Regulations 2004 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 Subject to paragraph (2), if an employer employs an accession State worker requiring registration during

a period in which the employer is not an authorised employer in relation to that worker, the employer shall be guilty of an offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
an employer
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an employer meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach regulation 9(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Accession (Immigration and Worker Registration) Regulations 2004.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
Maximum fine
£5,000
Standard scale
Level 5
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2004-05-01); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
28 April 2004
In force from
1 May 2004
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations amend the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2000 (“the 2000 Regulations”) and establish a worker registration scheme for workers from eight of the States that are acceding to the European Union on 1st May 2004. Part 1 of these Regulations (regulations 1 and 2) contain general provisions applicable to the Regulations. The Regulations will come into force on 1st May 2004 (regulation 1(1)). Regulation 1(2) and 2 contain definitions of expressions used in the Regulations. The amendments to the 2000 Regulations are contained in Part 2 (regulations 3 to 6). On 1st May 2004, under the Accession Treaty signed at Athens on 16th April 2003, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic will accede to the European Union. In general nationals of these States will have the same free movement rights as nationals of the existing Member States. The Accession Treaty provides, however, that existing Member States can, as a derogation from the usual position under European Community law, regulate access to their labour markets by nationals of the accession States (other than nationals of the Republic of Cyprus and the Republic of Malta). This derogation can be applied for a transitional period of five years from accession (with provision for a further two years in the case of disturbances to the labour markets). The existing Member States can derogate from the Community free movement rights of workers for this purpose during the transitional period. Regulation 3 amends the definition of “EEA State” in regulation 2(1) of the 2000 Regulations so that it will include the accession States. This will extend the European Community free movement rights, transposed by the 2000 Regulations, to accession State nationals and their family members, subject to the qualifications made in relation to accession State workers. Regulation 4 gives effect to the derogation provided for in the Accession Treaty to regulate access to the United Kingdom labour market by accession State nationals. Under regulation 4(2), nationals from the relevant accession States who come to the United Kingdom to seek work during the transitional period will not have a right to reside in the United Kingdom by virtue of that work seeker status. This is, however, without prejudice to their right to reside in the United Kingdom whilst looking for work if they are self-sufficient (regulation 4(3)). Regulation 5 modifies the application of the 2000 Regulations to workers from the relevant accession States who are “accession State workers requiring registration”, as defined in regulation 2. Under regulations 5(2) to (4) such workers will generally only have a right of residence in the UK as workers under the 2000 Regulations during a period in which they are working for an employer for whom they are authorised to work under the workers registration scheme in Part 3 of these Regulations. Whilst they require registration neither they nor their family members will be entitled to a residence permit or document (regulations 5(5) and (6)). Regulation 6 makes transitional provision to take account of the fact that on 1st May 2004 nationals from the accession States and their family members will fall to be treated under the 2000 Regulations for immigration purposes rather than under the Immigration Act 1971 regime. Part 3 (regulations 7 to 9) sets out the accession State worker registration scheme, which will apply to accession State workers requiring registration. Under regulation 7 workers requiring registration who are already in legal employment on 30th April 2004 can continue to work for the employer concerned without further registration. Workers requiring registration who begin work on or after 1st May 2004 have to apply, within one month of beginning working, for a registration certificate authorising them to work for the employer concerned if they are to be authorised to work for that employer for more than a month. Special provision is made in regulation 7(4) in relation to seasonal agricultural workers until 31st December 2004. Regulation 8 sets out the registration procedure. Workers requiring registration will be issued with a registration card and a registration certificate authorising them to work for the employer concerned. A fee of £50 will be changed for the first registration to cover the administrative costs of registration. Regulation 9 makes it an offence for an employer to employ a worker who is not authorised under the registration scheme to work for that employer.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source