Transport by ship
regulation 27(12) of The Nuclear Industries Security Regulations 2003
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Energy, communications, water and utilities
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
12 Regulation 25 applies with the substitution for paragraph (1) of the following paragraph— 1 If— a any person fails to comply with an obligation that, by virtue of regulation 27(4), is to be met in respect of a ship as a condition of its entry into a port in the United Kingdom, and b the ship enters or has entered the port or an attempt is or has been made for it to do so, he shall be guilty of an offence. .
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 27(12)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Nuclear Industries Security Regulations 2003, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 26 February 2003
- In force from
- 22 March 2003
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations provide for the regulation of the civil nuclear industry for security purposes and prescribe certain types of fissile material as “nuclear material” for the purposes of the definition of “nuclear material” in section 76(7) of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. The Regulations are in five Parts. Part 1 provides for introductory matters. Regulation 1 provides that the Regulations will commence on 22nd March 2003, except for Part 3, and Parts 1 and 5 so far as they apply for the purposes of Part 3, which will commence on 22nd September 2003. It also revokes the Regulations formerly providing for the regulation of the security of nuclear generating stations, the Nuclear Generating Stations (Security) Regulations 1996. Regulation 2 sets out the meanings of a number of expressions used in the Regulations. Regulation 3 extends the definition of “nuclear material” in section 76 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 by prescribing certain additional kinds of material. (This definition applies for the purposes of these Regulations.) Part 2 makes provision about the security of nuclear premises. Regulation 4 requires that there should be an approved security plan for each nuclear premises. It sets out what the plan must contain. For existing nuclear premises this requirement does not apply until 22nd June 2003. But if a draft plan has been submitted to the Secretary of State before, the requirement only applies when the Secretary of State approves a security plan for the premises. Regulations 5 and 6 provide for the submission of the first draft security plans for nuclear premises to the Secretary of State, for her to approve them with or without modifications and for amendments and replacements of approved plans to be submitted to her for approval. It also enables her to revoke approved plans which are replaced. Regulation 7 imposes an obligation on the responsible person in relation to any nuclear premises to comply with the approved security plan for the premises. Regulation 8 requires temporary security plans to be submitted and approved for works affecting nuclear premises, except in certain circumstances. Regulation 9 requires the responsible person to ensure that staff identified in the approved security plan are approved by the Secretary of State as being suitable. Regulation 10 requires the responsible person to report certain events and matters to the Secretary of State (in practice, the Office for Civil Nuclear Security) within 24 hours. Regulation 11 requires the responsible person to comply with directions given by the Secretary of State for security purposes. Regulation 12 makes transitional provision by requiring certain operators who had obligations deriving from existing approved security plans under preceding legislation to continue to comply with those obligations until there is an approved security plan under these regulations for their premises. Part 3 makes provision about the security of transport of nuclear material. Regulation 13 prohibits any person from transporting certain categories of nuclear material unless he is an approved carrier for the category of material in question, and requires the responsible person for nuclear premises to ensure that transports arranged by him to and from his premises are by such carriers. Regulations 14 and 15 provide for the approval of carriers by the Secretary of State, and the revocation of such approvals. A carrier may only be approved under regulation 14 if he has submitted a transport security statement to the Secretary of State which she has approved, and regulation 16 makes further provision about the submission, content and amendment of those statements. Regulation 17 requires approved carriers to comply with those statements and to notify the Secretary of State about relevant changes that have occurred. It also imposes an obligation on approved carriers to ensure that staff identified in their approved transport security statement are approved by the Secretary of State as being suitable. Regulation 18 requires approved carriers to report certain events and matters to the Secretary of State (in practice, the Office for Civil Nuclear Security) within 24 hours. Regulation 19 prohibits approved carriers from transporting Category I/II nuclear material unless a transport plan relating to the particular transport has been approved by the Secretary of State, and provides for the submission and approval of such plans. The carrier must comply with the plan. Regulation 20 requires advance notice to be given by a carrier to the Secretary of State when Category III nuclear material is to be transported, except where the carrier is the operator of a roll on roll off ferry. Regulation 21 requires approved carriers to comply with directions given by the Secretary of State for security purposes that relate to their business as carriers of nuclear material. Part 4 makes provision about the security of sensitive nuclear information. Regulation 22 requires certain persons to maintain adequate security standards, to comply with directions from the Secretary of State, to ensure that staff identified in such a direction are approved by the Secretary of State as being suitable, and to report security incidents to her. Part 5 contains general and supplementary provisions. Regulation 23 applies a number of provisions of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 for the purposes of the Regulations with modifications. Regulation 24 applies a number of provisions of the Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 for the purposes of the Regulations with modifications. Regulation 25 makes provision about offences where there is a failure to comply with the Regulations. Regulation 26 excludes premises used for defence purposes and transports for those purposes from the scope of the Regulations. Regulation 27 provides that the Regulations apply to all transport in United Kingdom ships. It also provides that regulations 18 to 21 and the introductory, general and supplementary provisions apply (with certain modifications) to transport in non-United Kingdom ships within the United Kingdom or its territorial sea that are proceeding to or from United Kingdom ports for the purpose of transporting nuclear material. There is an exclusion for ships owned by foreign Governments that are not being used for commercial purposes. Regulation 28 provides for the Regulations to apply to hovercraft in a similar way to that in which they apply to ships. A regulatory impact assessment in respect of these Regulations may be obtained from the Department of Trade and Industry, Energy Innovation and Business Unit, 1 Victoria Street, London SWIH 0ET. A copy has been placed in the library of each House of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Draft Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2016
Commons · 12 July 2016 · Andrea Leadsom
The hon. Gentleman’s interpretation is correct. First of all, material is identified as being under the auspices of either the MOD or the civil nuclear programme, and the regulation is dealt with accordingly. As I have said, the Ministry of Defence is not covered by either the convention or the Nuclear Industries Security Regulations 2003—it has its own regime—so the definition of which material comes under which…
-
Draft Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2016
Commons · 12 July 2016 · The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Andrea Leadsom)
I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2016. It is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Turner. The UK is highly regarded by the International Atomic Energy Agency and other key international partners in civil nuclear security. We take our international role in this field very seriously, including with regards to regulation.…
-
Draft Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2017
Commons · 21 February 2017 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Jesse Norman)
I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2017. It is a delight, Mr Pritchard, to serve under your chairmanship. I will give some background information on the draft regulations and explain why we are making the amendments. The UK takes civil nuclear security issues seriously, including with regard to regulation. Since 1980, this country has been…
-
Nuclear Industries Security (Amendment) Regulations 2017
Lords · 28 February 2017 · Baroness Buscombe (Con)
My Lords, I will begin by giving some background information and explaining why we are making these amendments. The UK takes civil nuclear security issues very seriously, including with regard to regulation. Since 1980, the UK has been a signatory to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material—the CPPNM. The convention requires signatories to have in place a robust legislative and regulatory…
Other offences in the same instrument
- If any person fails to comply with any provision of regulation 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20,…regulation 25(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Nuclear Industries Security Regulations 2003 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Energy, communications, water and utilitiesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2003