UK Offence Report

Contravention of The Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2000

the instrument as a whole of The Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2000 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

Contravening this instrument is an offence under section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
Not determined

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.

What would breach the instrument as a whole?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2000.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
11 September 2000
In force from
10 October 2000
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations update and replace the Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 1999 (S.I. 1999/645 as amended by S.I. 1999/2024, 1999/2597 and 1999/3232). They fix or determine the fees payable by an applicant to the Health and Safety Executive in respect of an application made for— an approval under mines and quarries legislation (regulation 2 and Schedule 1); an approval of certain respiratory protective equipment (regulation 3 and Schedule 2); an approval of plant or equipment under the Agriculture (Tractor Cabs) Regulations 1974 (regulation 4 and Schedule 3); an approval of a scheme or programme under the Freight Containers (Safety Convention) Regulations 1984 (regulation 5 and Schedule 4); a licence under the Asbestos (Licensing) Regulations 1983 (regulation 6 and Schedule 5); an approval of dosimetry services or type approval of apparatus under the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 (regulation 9 and Schedule 8); an approval, authorisation or licence etc. under the Explosives Act 1875 and certain instruments thereunder, for a licence under the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928 or for the classification of an article, substance, combination or unit load under the Classification and Labelling of Explosives Regulations 1983 (regulation 10 and Schedule 9); an explosives licence under Part IX of the Dangerous Substances in Harbour Areas Regulations 1987 (regulation 12 and Schedule 10); an approval under the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (Driver Training) Regulations 1996 (regulation 14 and Schedule 12); an approval under the Health and Safety (First-Aid) Regulations 1981 (regulation 23 and Schedule 19); and in respect of— a vocational training certificate under the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (Driver Training) Regulations 1996 (regulation 13 and Schedule 11); a vocational training certificate under the Transport of Dangerous Goods (Safety Advisers) Regulations 1999 (regulation 15 and Schedule 13,); a notification under the Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 1992 (regulation 17 and Schedule 14); a notification or application under the Notification of New Substances Regulations 1993 (regulation 18 and Schedule 15). The Regulations fix or determine the fees payable by specified persons in the offshore, rail and gas industries for the performance by the Executive of the functions specified in those provisions (regulations 19 to 22 and Schedules 16 to 18). The Regulations update the fees to be paid in respect of medical examinations and surveillance by an employment medical adviser which are required under certain of the relevant statutory provisions (regulations 7 and 8 and Schedules 6 and 7). The Regulations update maximum fees which may be charged under the Explosives Act 1875, the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928 and the Petroleum (Transfer of Licences) Act 1936 (regulation 10 (2) and Schedule 9, Part II). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment prepared in respect of regulation 23 and Schedule 19 can be obtained from the Health and Safety Executive, Economic Adviser’s Unit, Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London SE1 9HS. A copy has been placed in the Library of each House of Parliament. The new fees compared with those fixed by or determined under the previous fee-charging provisions are as follows: The Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 where surveillance is confined to examination of, and making entries in, records in other cases On each subsequent assessment of an employee— for laboratory tests where these are carried out for a clinical medical examination where this is carried out Dose record keeping where the application is solely in respect of Group I function External dosimetry Internal dosimetry Bio-assay or in-vivo monitoring or air sampling for each additional technique Factory licence A store licence Licence to keep petroleum spirit of a quantity— not exceeding 2,500 litres exceeding 2,500 litres but not exceeding 50,000 litres exceeding 50,000 litres Original approval of premises in which acetylene is to be manufactured or kept Comparison of a porous substance with a sample porous substance Classification of an explosive under the Classification and Labelling of Explosives Regulations 1983 or authorisation of an explosive under section 40(9) of the Explosives Act 1875 Testing in connection with specified applications in Parts I, III, IV or V Approval of training Notification of intention to use premises for activities involving genetic modification for the first time under regulations 8 other than a case where a consent is required under regulation 8(3) For the evaluation of a notification under regulation 4 (“base set”) (see note 1) For a notification under regulation 6 (see note 2)— quantity of the new substance equal to or more than 100kg (regulation 6(1)) quantity of the new substance up to 100kg (regulation 6(2))

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.59.

Basis
the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
Confidence
0.59 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source