UK Offence Report

Publicity where an environmental statement is submitted after the planning application

regulation 14(7) of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

7 If any person issues

a certificate which purports to comply with the requirements of paragraph (5)(b) and which contains

a statement which he knows to be false or misleading in

a material particular, or recklessly issues

a certificate which purports to comply with those requirements and which contains

a statement which is false or misleading in

a material particular, he shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to

a fine not exceeding level

3 on the standard scale.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
making a false or misleading statement
Fault element
Requires proof of a state of mind
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (recklessly).

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: recklessly.

What would breach regulation 14(7)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999.
  2. Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
  3. Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
Maximum fine
£1,000
Standard scale
Level 3
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
10 February 1999
In force from
14 March 1999
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations implement, in relation to town and country planning in England and Wales, Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (O.J. No. L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40), as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC (O.J. No. L 73, 14.3.1997, p.5). The Regulations revoke and re-enact, with amendments, the Town and Country Planning (Assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations 1988 (and later instruments amending them) and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Assessment and Unauthorised Development) Regulations 1995. They revoke the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Assessment and Permitted Development) Regulations 1995 and regulation 22 of the Town and Country Planning (Simplified Planning Zones) Regulations 1992, and enact provisions with similar effect. The main changes made by Directive 97/11/EC, which these Regulations implement, are as follows. The number of categories of project subject to environmental impact assessment (EIA) is increased. An individual determination on whether EIA is required must be made in respect of every project in Annex II to the Directive (Schedule 2 to these Regulations) which exceeds thresholds established by a Member State. Advice on the content of an environmental statement must be given to a developer who requests it before submitting an application. Competent authorities must give reasons for their decision on granting or refusing development consent. The Directive establishes detailed procedures for consulting other Member States on projects which are likely to have significant environmental effects in their territories. The Regulations impose procedural requirements in relation to the consideration of applications for planning permission under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and in relation to enforcement of planning control, and restrict the grant of permission by simplified planning zone schemes, enterprise zones and the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995. All development in Schedule 1 requires EIA. Development in Column 1 of the table in Schedule 2 which is either to be carried out in a sensitive area or satisfies a threshold or criterion in Column 2 of that table (“Schedule 2 development”) requires EIA if it is likely to have significant effects on the environment. Development which requires EIA is referred to in these Regulations as “EIA development”. Regulation 3 prohibits the grant of planning permission for EIA development unless the local planning authority, the Secretary of State or an inspector have first taken account of the environmental information (defined in regulation 2) which is before them. The prohibition applies where an application is received by or lodged by the local planning authority on or after 14th March 1999. Regulations 4 to 9 set out procedures for determining whether development is EIA development (“screening”). They require a “screening opinion” of the local planning authority or a “screening direction” of the Secretary of State in relation to all Schedule 2 development. Such an opinion or direction must be made by reference to the criteria in Schedule 3. Where the authority or the Secretary of State determine that development is EIA development, they must notify the applicant (or appellant) that he is required to submit an environmental statement. Regulations 10 and 11 enable a person to seek an opinion from the local planning authority (“a scoping opinion”) or the Secretary of State (a “scoping direction”) on the information to be included in an environmental statement. The types of information which may be required are set out in Schedule 4. The local planning authority or the Secretary of State must consult bodies with environmental responsibilities (“the consultation bodies” defined in regulation 2(1)) before adopting a scoping opinion or scoping direction. Regulation 12 requires consultation bodies, if requested, to assist the preparation of an environmental statement by making information available to the applicant. Regulation 13 requires the local planning authority to notify the consultation bodies of applications for planning permission which are accompanied by an environmental statement. Regulation 16 contains equivalent provisions where an environmental statement is submitted to the Secretary of State in relation to an appeal or called in application. Regulation 14 provides for publicity for applications for planning permission where an environmental statement is submitted after a planning application. Regulations 15, 17 and 18 are concerned with the provision of copies of an environmental statement. Regulation 19 contains procedures for the provision by the applicant of information additional to that contained in the environmental statement. Regulation 20 provides for documents to be placed on the planning register or otherwise made available to the public. Regulation 21 requires local planning authorities and the Secretary of State to provide information about decisions taken following the consideration of environmental information in accordance with these Regulations. Regulation 22 modifies the earlier provisions of these Regulations in relation to applications for planning permission by a local planning authority. Regulations 23 and 24 restrict the grant of planning permission by simplified planning zone schemes or enterprise zone orders. Regulation 25 establishes procedures for EIA in relation to the enforcement of planning control. Regulations 26 to 28 implement Article 7 of the Directive by providing for consultation between Member States where development is likely to have significant effects on the environment in another Member State. Regulation 29 provides for the service of notices under the Regulations. Regulation 30 provides that a grant of permission in contravention of regulation 3 or 25(1) shall be treated, for the purpose of section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as an act which is not within the powers of that Act. Regulation 31 provides that beginning specified operations to dispose of hazardous waste constitutes “development” under section 55 of the 1990 Act. Regulation 32 extends the time allowed to a local planning authority to consider an application for planning permission for EIA development. Regulation 33 extends, in relation to EIA, the statutory power to provide in a development order for the giving of directions. Regulation 34 and Schedule 5 contain revocations and transitional provisions. Regulation 35 provides for miscellaneous and consequential amendments. Regulation 35(3) provides for a person who is minded to undertake development which would otherwise be permitted development to seek an opinion from the local planning authority as to whether the development is EIA development. A regulatory Impact Appraisal has been prepared in relation to these Regulations. It has been placed in the Library of each House of Parliament and copies may be obtained from PD5A Division, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU (Telephone 0171-890 3893) or Planning Division, Welsh Office, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF1 3NQ (Telephone 01222-823882).

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source