Movement of a controlled wine-sector product
regulation 22(2) of The Common Agricultural Policy (Wine) Regulations 1996
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
2 Any person who, knowing
a wine-sector product to be
a controlled wine-sector product—
a removes from it, or
b causes to be removed from it,
a label which has been affixed under regulation 9(5) shall be guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 22(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Common Agricultural Policy (Wine) Regulations 1996.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (1996-04-01); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 6 March 1996
- In force from
- 1 April 1996
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations, which apply throughout the United Kingdom and come into force on 1st April 1996, provide for the enforcement of EC Regulations (as specified in Schedules 1 and 2) concerned with the production and marketing of wine and related products. They revoke and re-enact with amendments the provisions of the Common Agricultural Policy (Wine) Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995/615). The Regulations— i designate competent authorities, agencies and a liaison authority for the purposes of enforcement (regulation 3); ii define “medium dry” for the purposes of labelling and description (regulation 4); iii specify conditions for the use of geographical ascriptions for the designation of table wine (regulation 5); iv exempt certain products from provisions relating to information required on labels (regulation 6); v permit the planting for certain purposes of vine varieties whose planting would otherwise be prohibited (regulation 7); vi provide for powers of inspection and enforcement (regulation 8); vii authorise controls on the movement of wine sector products and provide for specification as to whether and what steps are called for in order to ensure that controls on movement are withdrawn (regulations 9 and 10); viii provide for reviews of prohibitions etc, on movement of wine-sector products and notification of rights of review (regulation 11); ix relieve authorised officers of personal liability for acts done by them in execution of the Regulations (regulation 12); x confer on courts (other than courts in Scotland) before which proceedings are brought powers in relation to the analysis and examination of samples (regulation 13); xi specify the regions in the United Kingdom for producing quality wines psr (regulation 15); xii specify the list of vine varieties, minimum natural alcoholic strength, maximum yield per hectare and analytical test in the production of quality wine psr and permit the production of such wine in areas of immediate proximity to the specified regions (regulations 16 to 20); and xiii prescribe offences and penalties and provide defences (regulations 21 to 25). The Schedules have been revised and brought up to date so as to include references to any secondary legislation of the European Community which has been adopted or identified as requiring inclusion since the Common Agricultural Policy (Wine) Regulations 1995 came into force and to delete references to any such secondary legislation which has been repealed or superseded or has become redundant. Subject to that, and to minor drafting changes, the format of these Regulations follows that used in the revoked 1995 Regulations, save that the review procedure in regulation 11 and the requirement, in regulation 9, to specify whether and what steps are called for to ensure that controls on movement are withdrawn are introduced in these Regulations, and so is the limitation, in regulation 13, of the power of courts in relation to analysis and examination of samples to courts outside Scotland, and so is the application, in regulations 21 to 23, of the concepts of the statutory maximum and the standard scale to penalties for offences in Northern Ireland which were previously subject to fines at fixed sums. In Schedule 1 each Regulation is given the title which appears in the Official Journal except in cases where the title refers to a Regulation that has been repealed or superseded. In such a case the title given in Schedule 1 refers to the superseding Regulation and the title in the Official Journal is given in a footnote. In addition, footnotes to Schedule 1 identify provisions within it which are subject to adaptations effected by the Agreement on the European Economic Area. A Compliance Cost Assessment has been prepared and has been deposited in the library of each House of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- If any person contravenes, or fails to comply with, regulation 5 or any of the relevant Community provisions…regulation 21(1)
- If any person— a contravenes, or fails to comply with, any of the relevant Community provisions referred to…regulation 21(2)
- Movement of a controlled wine-sector productregulation 22(1)
- Movement of a controlled wine-sector productregulation 22(3)
- Obstructionregulation 23
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Common Agricultural Policy (Wine) Regulations 1996 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1996