20 Any person who, without lawful authority or excuse, proof of which shall lie on him— a defaces,…
article 20 of The Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (No. 2) Order 1996
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlife
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
20 Any person who, without lawful authority or excuse, proof of which shall lie on him—
a defaces, obliterates or removes any mark applied to any bovine animal or carcase under article 6(2)(c);
b contravenes or fails to comply with article 5(1), (2) or (3), 6(3), 7(2) or (7), 12(1), 13(1), 14(1), (2), (3) or (4), 15(1) or (2), 17(1), (2), (3), (4) or (5), or 19;
c fails to comply with any notice served under article 6(4), 7(1), 8(1), 9(1), 15(5) or 16(1) or (2);
d fails to comply with any condition of
a licence issued under article 6(5)(b), 7(3), 8(1), 12(2)(b), 13(2) or 14(5); or
e knowingly causes or permits any such contravention or non-compliance, commits an offence against the Act.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to comply with a notice or direction
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly; qualified by lawful excuse (an element).
The defence, as drafted
20 Any person who, without lawful authority or excuse, proof of which shall lie on him— a defaces, obliterates or removes any mark applied to any bovine animal or carcase under article 6(2)(c); b contravenes or fails to comply with article 5(1), (2) or (3), 6(3), 7(2) or (7), 12(1), 13(1), 14(1), (2), (3) or (4)
What would breach article 20?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Being served with a notice under the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (No. 2) Order 1996 and doing nothing by the date it specifies.
- Doing part of what the notice requires, where it required all of it.
- Disagreeing with the notice and ignoring it, rather than using whatever appeal the instrument provides.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 17 December 1996
- In force from
- 24 January 1997
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order revokes and re-makes with amendments the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Order 1996. The Order continues to provide for— a the compulsory notification of BSE in bovine animals (article 5); b the investigation, examination, testing and sampling and marking of bovine animals and their carcases for this purpose (article 6(1) and (2)); c the imposition of requirements in respect of affected or suspected animals or carcases by service of a notice in Form A (article 6); d the prohibition on movement of other bovine animals by notice in writing (article 8); e the cleansing and disinfection of premises and equipment (article 9); f the application of section 32 of the Animal Health Act 1981 (slaughter of animals) (article 10); g the seizure of carcases for the purposes of preventing the spread of the disease and the provision of compensation (article 11); h the prohibition (subject to certain exemptions) of the sale, supply and use of milk from affected or suspected animals (article 12); i the prohibition (subject to certain exemptions) of the sale, supply and use of feeding stuffs containing mammalian protein or mammalian meat and bone meal (articles 13 and 14); j the prohibition (subject to certain exemptions) of the possession of mammalian meat and bone meal or any product containing mammalian meat and bone meal on any premises where livestock feeding stuffs are produced or stored, or where livestock is kept (article 14); k the cleansing and disinfection of places, vehicles and equipment where mammalian meat and bone meal and MBM products have been produced, stored or used (article 15); l the disposal of mammalian meat and bone meal and MBM products by persons for whom possession of such products is illegal and the recall of any feeding stuff for livestock found to have been illegally sold (article 16); m the keeping of records by persons consigning, transporting and using mammalian meat and bone meal (article 17); and n sampling of protein or feeding stuffs (article 18), production of licences (article 19), offences (article 20) and enforcment (article 21). The Order introduces new provisions which impose requirements relating to exposed animals or carcases of exposed animals (articles 7 and 10(3)). In making provision for the slaughter of animals exposed to the infection of BSE, the Order implements in part Article 2 of Commission Decision 96/385/EC approving the plan for the eradication of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the United Kingdom (OJ No. L151, 26.6.96, p.39). A Compliance Cost Assessment for this Order has been prepared and placed in the library of each House of Parliament. Copies can be obtained from the Animal Health (BSE) Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Government Buildings (Toby Jug), Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 7DX.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Bse
Commons · 21 January 1997 · The Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Mr. Douglas Hogg)
The House has discussed the selective cull on a number of occasions and is well acquainted with the issues. Furthermore, the time allocated for debate is short. Therefore, my intention is to be brief. There are two statutory instruments before the House. The first is the Selective Cull (Enforcement of Community Compensation Conditions) Regulations 1996 and the second is the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (No. 2) Order 1996 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlifeOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1996