Offences and enforcement
regulation 22(1) of The Infant Formula and Follow–on Formula Regulations 1995
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 If any person contravenes or fails to comply with any of the provisions contained in regulations 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 he shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 22(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Infant Formula and Follow–on Formula Regulations 1995, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 15 January 1995
- In force from
- 1 March 1995
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations, which apply to Great Britain, come into force on 1st March 1995. They implement Commission Directive 91/321/EEC (OJ No. L175, 4.7.91, p.35) on infant formulae (which are foods suitable as the sole source of nutrition for infants during the first four to six months of life and often form an important part of the diet throughout infancy) and follow-on formulae (which are foods given to older infants and young children as an alternative to milk or infant formulae). They also implement Council Directive 92/52/EEC (OJ No. L179, 1.7.92, p.129) on infant formulae and follow-on formulae intended for export to third countries. The principal provisions of the Regulations— 1 prohibit the sale of food labelled as infant formulae or follow-on formulae unless it complies with the requirements of the Regulations as to composition, labelling, appearance and packaging (regulations 2, 3 and 8 to 16); 2 require infant formulae and follow-on formulae exported to countries not in the European Community to comply with similar compositional standards unless the importing country otherwise permits and require products to be labelled in an appropriate language and in a way which avoids confusion between infant formulae and follow-on formulae (regulations 5, 6 and 7); 3 limit the advertising of infant formulae to specified types of publications and restrict the content of advertisements for infant formulae and follow-on formulae (regulations 17 and 18); 4 prohibit special displays or promotions of infant formulae at retail outlets (regulation 19); 5 prohibit the promotion of infant formulae to the general public, expectant mothers, and others by providing such formulae free or at reduced prices (regulation 20); 6 lay down requirements as to the information to be contained in informational and educational materials dealing with the feeding of infants and intended to reach pregnant women and mothers of infants and young children, and regulate the cases in which a manufacturer or distributor of infant formulae may make gifts of informational or educational equipment or materials (regulation 21). The standards for infant formula or follow-on formula established by the Codex Alimentarius are available for inspection at the Library of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH and at the Scottish Office, New St. Andrew’s House, St. James' Square, Edinburgh EH1 3TE. A Compliance Cost Assessment in relation to these Regulations has been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament and copies can be obtained from the Consumer Protection Division of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Ergon House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Infant Formula
Commons · 4 April 1995 · Mr. Martyn Jones (Clwyd, South-West)
I beg to move, That the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula Regulations 1995 (S.1., 1995, No. 77), dated 15th January 1995, a copy of which was laid before this House on 16th January, be revoked. When the new regulations that we are discussing came in, all looked well, briefly. It seemed that at last we had law controlling the advertising of infant formula milks, but it soon became clear that the law was the…
-
Breast Milk Substitutes
Lords · 29 June 1995 · The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Earl Howe)
My Lords, this has been a useful debate. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Rea, for initiating it, and I welcome the opportunity to reply to some of the points raised by noble Lords who have spoken. First, I should like to emphasise the Government's commitment to the promotion of breast-feeding as the hest means of nurturing a baby. That is based on medical advice which is quite unequivocal about the advantages…
-
Breast Milk Substitutes
Lords · 29 June 1995 · Lord Rea
rose to ask Her Majesty's Government why, in the Infant Formula and Follow-On Formula Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995/77), they have disregarded the World Health Organisation code on marketing of breast milk substitutes by allowing brand name advertising to the public through the healthcare system.
-
Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (England) Regulations 2007
Lords · 18 February 2008 · Baroness Thornton
My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, for introducing this important debate on the merits of the new Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (England) Regulations 2007, laid before the House in December, and I thank other noble Lords for their contributions. It is with trepidation that I begin these remarks, given the reputation and expertise that that noble Baroness brings to your Lordships’ House and I…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Infant Formula and Follow–on Formula Regulations 1995 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted salesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1995