Offences and penalties
regulation 15(2) of The Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers' Licensing) Regulations 1995
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
2 A person who contravenes the provisions of regulations 3, 4 or 14 shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine of an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum or on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or both.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 15(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person contravenes the provisions of regulations 3, 4 or 14.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers' Licensing) Regulations 1995, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £1,000
- Standard scale
- Level 3
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 2 years
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 10 April 1995
- In force from
- 10 May 1995
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke and replace the Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers' Licensing) Regulations 1972, as amended. In addition to some minor and drafting amendments the following changes are made: 1 The only categories of person who may, in the United Kingdom, make available flight accommodation, and hold themselves out as being entitled to do so, are set out in regulation 3. Those categories have been extended to include any person who is capable of supplying a valid ticket for the relevant flight and who, before accepting any payment, supplies such a ticket (regulation 3). 2 All persons holding themselves out as being entitled to make available flight accommodation are required to disclose the capacity in which they are so entitled and if acting as agent for the holder of an Air Travel Organiser’s Licence to identify their principal (regulation 3). 3 New provisions relating to the acceptance of payment and provision of receipts have been introduced (regulation 4). The contravention of those requirements is an offence in respect of which the penalties are set out in regulation 15(2). 4 Regulation 9(1)(b) of the 1972 Regulations (which provided that on the transfer of the business, or the relevant part thereof, of an ATOL holder, the licence would in the circumstances specified be treated as if it had been granted to the transferee) has been omitted. 5 The fine payable on summary conviction for failing to surrender a licence when requested to do so by the Authority pursuant to regulation 13 has been increased to an amount not exceeding Level 3 on the standard scale (regulation 15(1)). 6 The fine payable on summary conviction for contravening regulations 3 (see above) and 14 (failure to comply with the terms of a licence and furnishing false information) has been increased to an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum (regulation 15(2)).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Charter Holiday Industry
Commons · 23 July 2002 · The Minister for Employment Relations, Industry and the Regions (Alan Johnson)
I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this debate, which is topical as we are now in the holiday season. He raised important issues and made typically shrewd observations on the travel industry and the need to protect holidaymakers. I shall speak first about the holiday market in the United Kingdom, which is one of the largest and most diverse in Europe with about 20 million packages sold every year and a…
-
Christmas Savings Schemes (Regulation)
Commons · 23 January 2008 · Anne Snelgrove (South Swindon) (Lab)
I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for the regulation of Christmas savings schemes; and for connected purposes. I am introducing this Bill as a result of the Farepak collapse, which in 2006 wiped out the Christmas savings of at least 122,000 small savers in this country. I am pressing for light-touch regulation for similar schemes, so that in future all savers’ money is…
Other offences in the same instrument
- Any person who fails, without reasonable cause, to comply with any requirement of the Authority pursuant to…regulation 15(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers' Licensing) Regulations 1995 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harboursOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1995