A Community air carrier which knowingly or recklessly exercises traffic rights on routes within the United…
regulation 6 of The Access for Community Air Carriers to Intra- Community Air Routes Regulations 1992
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
6 A Community air carrier which knowingly or recklessly exercises traffic rights on routes within the United Kingdom or between the United Kingdom and Gibraltar or between the United Kingdom and another member State in the absence of
a permission so to do, which shall include exercising such rights—
a in breach of any access regulation imposed by virtue of paragraph
4 of article
3 of the Council Regulation;
b in breach of obligations required by
a public service obligation imposed by virtue of paragraph 1(a) of article
4 of the Council Regulation;
c in breach of an access limitation imposed by virtue of paragraph 1(d) of article
4 of the Council Regulation;
d in breach of an exclusive concession which continues in force by virtue of article
5 of the Council Regulation;
e in breach of conditions imposed by virtue of article
6 of the Council Regulation; or
f in circumstances where paragraph
8 of article
9 of the Council Regulation applies and, in consequence of that paragraph, the new service or increased frequency, as the case may be, is not authorised; shall be guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a community air carrier
- Conduct
- breaching a condition of a licence, permit or consent
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly, knowingly or recklessly, recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, recklessly, knowingly or recklessly.
What would breach regulation 6?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Holding a valid licence but doing the thing it allows outside the hours, place or limits its conditions set under the Access for Community Air Carriers to Intra- Community Air Routes Regulations 1992.
- Failing to do something a condition positively requires - a record, a notification, a monitoring step - even though the licensed activity itself is carried on properly.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- Unlimited
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 2 years
'to a fine' with no stated maximum.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 1 December 1992
- In force from
- 1 January 1993
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make provision for implementing the Community obligations of the United Kingdom provided for in Council Regulation 2408/92 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes and matters arising out of or related thereto. The Secretary of State is specified as the competent authority for the purposes of the Council Regulation (regulation 3). Permission to operate intra-Community air routes is conferred on Community air carriers (regulation 4). The foregoing permission is expressed not to apply in a number of instances including in particular cabotage routes and routes subject to a public service obligation limited to one carrier (regulation 5). Operating on routes without permission or in breach of traffic distribution rules is made an offence as is operating in breach of rules, conditions, limitations or refusals that the Council Regulation permits may apply (regulations 6 to 8). Failing to give, or giving false, information also becomes an offence (regulation 9). Provision is made for review of the decisions of the Secretary of State relating to public service obligations (regulation 13). Article 88 of the Air Navigation Order 1989 is amended to disapply the requirement for a permit in cases where a permission to operate exists by virtue of the Council Regulation (regulation 14).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A Community air carrier which knowingly or recklessly exercises traffic rights in breach of traffic…regulation 7
- A Community air carrier which knowingly or recklessly exercises traffic rights in breach of rules referred…regulation 8
- A Community air carrier which fails without reasonable excuse to comply with the requirements of a notice…regulation 9(2)
- A Community air carrier which, in purported compliance with the requirements of any such notice, knowingly…regulation 9(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Access for Community Air Carriers to Intra- Community Air Routes Regulations 1992 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harboursOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1992