Contravention of The Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992
the instrument as a whole of The Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
Contravening this instrument is an offence under section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Not determined
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.
What would breach the instrument as a whole?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 16 November 1992
- In force from
- 31 May 1993
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations provide for the preparation of safety cases for offshore installations and for the notification of specified activities to the Health and Safety Executive (“the Executive”). A safety case is defined in the Regulations as a document containing specified information relating to the management of health and safety and the control of major accident hazards and containing the particulars specified in the Schedule referred to in the provision of the Regulations under which it is prepared (regulations 2(2) and 8). The Regulations— a require a safety case to be sent to the Executive before the completion of the design of a fixed installation (regulation 4(1) and Schedule 1); b prohibit the operation of a fixed installation unless a safety case has been sent to and accepted by the Executive (regulation 4(2) and Schedule 2); c prohibit the movement of a mobile installation in relevant waters (as defined in regulation 2(1)) with a view to its being operated there unless a safety case has been sent to and accepted by the Executive (regulation 5 and Schedule 3); d prohibit the engagement of an installation in a combined operation with another unless a safety case has been sent to and accepted by the Executive (regulation 6 and Schedule 4); e prohibit the decommissioning of a fixed installation unless a safety case has been sent to and accepted by the Executive (regulation 7 and Schedule 5) ; f require a safety case to be revised as often as may be appropriate and at 3 yearly intervals, such revision to be accepted by the Executive where it is made at the 3 yearly interval or where it renders the safety case materially different from the last version sent to the Executive (regulation 9); g require any procedures or arrangements in safety cases to be followed and provide for specified defences for contravention of the requirement (regulation 10); h require well operations and specified construction activities to be notified to the Executive, such notifications to contain specified particulars (regulations 11 and 12 and Schedules 6 and 7); i contain transitional provisions in respect of activities in existence or com menced within a specified time of the coming into force of the Regulations (regulation 13); j impose requirements on specified persons to co-operate with the operator and owner of an offshore installation to enable them to comply with the provisions of the Regulations (regulation 14); k impose requirements with respect to the making and keeping of documents (regulation 15); l amend the Offshore Installations (Safety Representatives and Safety Commit tees) Regulations 1989 (S.I. 1989/971) as respects a safety representative’s entitlement to see and be supplied with documents and information, and amend those Regulations so as to require safety representatives to be consulted on the preparation of safety cases (regulation 16 and Schedule 8); m provide for the granting of exemptions from the Regulations by the Executive (regulation 17).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Health And Safety (North Sea Oil And Gas Industry)
Commons · 9 July 2003 · The Minister for Work (Mr. Desmond Browne)
I, too, pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Aberdeen, Central (Mr. Doran) for securing this important and timely debate, and for his sustained support over the years for the survivors and bereaved families of the Piper Alpha disaster, in the House and elsewhere. His support for those families and his consistent campaigning on the issues, which he brings to the attention of the House today, are well known.…
-
Piper Alpha Disaster (20th Anniversary)
Commons · 2 July 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mrs. Anne McGuire)
It is a pleasure to respond to this debate and to serve under your chairmanship, Mr. Bercow—this is the first time that you and I have met in this arena. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Aberdeen, North (Mr. Doran) on his success in the ballot and on introducing this appropriate debate to mark the 20th anniversary of the Piper Alpha disaster. Those of us who sat through his speech will have found it a…
-
Piper Alpha Disaster (20th Anniversary)
Commons · 2 July 2008 · Andrew Selous (South-West Bedfordshire) (Con)
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr. Bercow. I congratulate the hon. Member for Aberdeen, North (Mr. Doran) warmly on securing this important debate and on the tone and huge amount of knowledge and experience that he has brought to our proceedings. We are all extremely grateful. As the only English Member speaking in the debate, it is important that I put on record that this is a UK-wide issue. It…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.70.
- Basis
- the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
- Confidence
- 0.70 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1992