Offences and evidence
regulation 6(5) of The Statistics of Trade (Customs and Excise) Regulations 1992
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Tax, customs and excise
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
5 If, following
a request made by the Commissioners in accordance with Article 9(2) of the Principal Regulation, any person is required to provide information and fails to do so in accordance with the conditions set out in the request for such information he shall be liable on summary conviction to
a penalty not exceeding level
4 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 6(5)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Statistics of Trade (Customs and Excise) Regulations 1992, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £2,500
- Standard scale
- Level 4
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 6 November 1992
- In force from
- 1 December 1992
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
From 1 January 1993 the collection of statistics relating to the trading of goods between Member States will be governed by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3330/91 (OJ No. L316, 16.11.91, p. 1). From that date such statistics will be compiled by a new statistical collection system known as “Intrastat”. All VAT registered traders who are engaged in the trading of goods between Member States will be required to complete two boxes on their periodic VAT Return to provide the total value of goods dispatched to, and received from, other Member States. In addition, traders whose annual value of trade with other Member States exceeds a threshold of £135,000 for trade in goods dispatched, or for goods received, will be required to provide additional statistical information in a supplementary declaration. These Regulations place the responsibility for the care and management of the Intrastat system, as it applies to trade in goods with other Member States, with the Commissioners of Customs and Excise. They establish the Commissioners as the competent national department to whom supplementary declarations must be sent, and permit the Commissioners to take proceedings for non-compliance.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- If any person required to furnish a supplementary declaration in accordance with the Intrastat system fails…regulation 6(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.72.
- Basis
- the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.72 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Statistics of Trade (Customs and Excise) Regulations 1992 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Tax, customs and exciseOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1992