b shall be liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two…
regulation 13(1)(b) of The Medicines (Medicated Animal Feeding Stuffs) (No. 2) Regulations 1992
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Drugs and medicines
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
b shall be liable on conviction on indictment to
a fine or to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two years, or to both.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 13(1)(b)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Medicines (Medicated Animal Feeding Stuffs) (No. 2) Regulations 1992.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £2,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 2 years
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (1992-07-01); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Drug offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales
Covers importation, supply, production and possession of controlled drugs, with sentencing driven by drug class and the offender's role.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 25 June 1992
- In force from
- 1 July 1992
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations replace the Medicines (Medicated Animal Feeding Stuffs) Regulations 1992. These Regulations correct several minor drafting errors in the 1992 Regulations. In addition the Regulations— a substitute a new definition of “withdrawal period” (regulation 2(1)); b substantially increase the fee payable by manufacturers on registration, increase the fee for retention in the Register and decrease the fee for reinstatement in the Register (regulation 3(6)); c restrict the requirements relating to feeding stuffs imported from a member State to those in which a prescription only medicinal product has been incorporated (regulation 6(6)); d exempt pet shop owners, who sell final medicated feeding stuff in which a medicinal product has been incorporated (not being a prescription only product) by retail in pack sizes of 5 kg or less, from the requirement to be registered in either the Register of Merchants or of Manufacturers (regulation 8(1)). The Codes of Practice (for Category A and for Category B Registered Manufacturers of Medicated Animal Feeding Stuffs) are priced publications and are available from MAFF Publications, London SE99 7TP.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Any person who contravenes any provision of regulations 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 or 11 of these Regulations shall be…regulation 13(1)
- a shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; andregulation 13(1)(a)
- Any person who contravenes any provision of regulation 10 of these Regulations shall be guilty of an offence…regulation 13(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.72.
- Basis
- the provision states liability on summary conviction
- Confidence
- 0.72 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Medicines (Medicated Animal Feeding Stuffs) (No. 2) Regulations 1992 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Drugs and medicinesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1992