False statements
regulation 17(1) of The Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1991
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Summary only
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 If any person, for the purposes of obtaining for himself or any other person any grant under these Regulations, knowingly or recklessly makes
a false statement, he shall be liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly, knowingly or recklessly, recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, recklessly, knowingly or recklessly.
What would breach regulation 17(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1991.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- Unlimited
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
level 5 is unlimited in England and Wales for offences committed on or after 12 March 2015 (LASPO 2012 s.85, S.I. 2015/664).
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 17 July 1991
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations implement provisions in Title 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 797/85 (OJ No. L93, 30.3.85, p. 1) on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures (as amended by Council Regulations (EEC) Nos. 1760/87 (OJ No. L167, 26.6.87, p. 1), 1137/88 (OJ No. L108, 29.4.88, p.1), 2156/89 (OJ No. L207, 19.7.89, p. 12) and 3808/89 (OJ No. L371,20.12.89, p. 1)), and Article 1 of Council Directive No. 75/268/EEC (OJ No. L128, 19.5.75, p. 1) on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 797/85. The Regulations, which apply to Great Britain, make provision for aid for agricultural businesses, including aid for the diversification of such businesses by the establishment and carrying on of ancillary farm businesses, in the form of grants in respect of expenditure of a capital nature incurred in pursuance of approved improvement plans (regulation 9). The works, facilities and transactions eligible for grant and the rates of grant applicable to them are set out (regulation 10 and Schedules 1 to 3). Higher rates of grant may be payable for agricultural businesses in the Isles of Scilly (regulation 10(6) and (7) and Schedule 3) and in other less-favoured areas (regulation 10(2) and (3) and Schedule 1) and for businesses carried on by young farmers or by partnerships in which young farmers are partners (regulation 10(8) to (10)). Less-favoured areas are defined by reference to designated maps. These maps have been prepared by reference to the list of less-favoured farming areas contained in Council Directive 84/169/EEC (OJ No. L82, 26.3.84, p. 67) as amended by Commission Decision 91/25/EEC (OJ No. L16, 22.1.91, p. 25). The maps are available for inspection during normal office hours at the addresses specified in the definition of designated maps (regulation 2(1)). Copies of the maps may be inspected during normal office hours at any Regional or Divisional Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, at any Divisional Office of the Welsh Office Agriculture Department or at any Area Office of the Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department. Grant aid is payable to eligible persons in respect of eligible agricultural businesses (regulations 3 and 4), and in respect of specified ancillary farm businesses (regulation 2(1) and Schedule 2). To benefit from assistance an applicant must submit an improvement plan for approval by the appropriate Minister (regulation 5). The investments proposed under the plan must be justified from the point of view of the situation of the agricultural business and its economy and the applicant must show that completion of the plan will bring about a lasting improvement of that situation, especially the income per labour unit required in carrying on the business, or is necessary for maintaining the income per labour unit so required (regulation 6(1)). The Regulations also— a impose certain other restrictions on approval of improvement plans (regulations 6(2) to (10)); b provide for the variation and withdrawal of improvement plans (regulation 8); c provide for the keeping of accounts for the duration of improvement plans (regulations 5(3) and 11); d provide for standard costs (regulation 13); e provide for the reduction or withholding of grant in certain circumstances where it would otherwise be payable (regulation 15) and for the revocation of approval of an improvement plan and recovery of grant paid (regulations 16 and 17(6) and (7)); f create an offence, punishable on summary conviction with a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (currently £2,000), of knowingly or recklessly making a false statement to obtain grant, impose liability for that offence additionally on officers of a body corporateand set an extended time limit within which proceedings for the offence may be commenced (regulation 17(1) to (5)); g confer powers of entry (regulation 18); h set a closing date of 31st December 1994 for receipt of applications for improvement plans (regulation 7); j set closing dates for incurring certain expenditure (regulation 12(2)) and receipt of claims for certain grants (regulation 12(3)). Amendments are also made to the Agriculture Improvement Regulations 1985 and the Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989, being earlier Regulations relating to improving agricultural structures, to extend the areas of land which may be treated under those Regulations as less-favoured areas in accordance with Commission Decision 91/25/EEC (regulations 19(1) and 20(1)(a)). The amendments do not apply to claims for grant received before 18th July 1991 or claims towards expenditure incurred under those Regulations before 18th December 1990, the date of notification of the Commission Decision (regulations 19(2) and 20(2)). In respect of the Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989, amendments are also made to increase the maximum limits of expenditure which is eligible for grant aid (regulation 20(1)(b)) and to introduce an earlier closing date of 17th July 1991 for receipt of applications for approval of improvement plan under those Regulations (regulation 20(1)(c)).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Statutory Instruments, &C
Commons · 17 June 1991
Ordered, That the Farm Diversification Grant (Variation) (No. 2) Scheme 1991 (S.I., 1991, No. 1339) be referred to a Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments, &c. That the Farm and Conservation Grant (Variation) Scheme 1991 (S.I., 1991, No. 1338) be referred to a Standing Committee on Statutory Instruments, &c. That the draft Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1991 be referred to a Standing Committee on…
-
Agriculture
Commons · 2 July 1991
That the Farm Diversification Grant (Variation) (No. 2) Scheme 1991 (S.I., 1991, No. 1339), dated 6th June 1991, a copy of which was laid before this House on 10th June, be approved. That the Farm and Conservation Grant (Variation) Scheme 1991 (S.I., 1991, No. 1338), dated 6th June 1991, a copy of which was laid before this House on 10th June, be approved. That the draft Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations…
-
Farm Diversification Grant (Variation) (No 2) Scheme 1991
Lords · 3 July 1991
The instruments before the House today will implement the following changes. The Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1991 extend the improvement plan side of the F&CGS to include grants currently covered by the FDGS. The maximum amount of investment on which grant can be paid over any six year period will be increased from£74,000 to £85,000. Diversification work may account for up to £40,000 of this limit. The…
-
Farm And Conservation Grant(Variation) (No 2) Scheme 1994
Lords · 19 January 1995 · The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Earl Howe)
rose to move, That the scheme laid before the House on 29th November be approved [3rd Report from the Joint Committee]. The noble Earl said: My Lords, we are today debating a short instrument which withdraws the grants available to farmers throughout England, Scotland and Wales for waste handling facilities from the Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme. Before I explain the function of this instrument I should like…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.72.
- Basis
- the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.72 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1991 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1991