Contravention of The Sea Fish Licensing (Variation) (No. 2) Order 1990
the instrument as a whole of The Sea Fish Licensing (Variation) (No. 2) Order 1990
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Education, social security, pensions and public services
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
Contravening this instrument is an offence under sections 1(7)-(8) and
11 of the Sea Fish (Conservation) Act 1967. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- acting without the licence or authorisation required
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Not determined
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.
What would breach the instrument as a whole?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Starting the activity before the licence is granted, rather than on the day it takes effect under the Sea Fish Licensing (Variation) (No. 2) Order 1990.
- Carrying on after a licence has expired, been surrendered or been suspended.
- Relying on somebody else's authorisation, where the provision requires the person doing the act to hold one.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to sections 1(7)-(8) and 11 of the Sea Fish (Conservation) Act 1967.
the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 2 May 1990
- In force from
- 24 May 1990
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order varies the Sea Fish Licensing Order 1989, as varied, (“the principal Order”) which prohibits fishing, subject to exceptions, by British fishing boats in specified areas of sea for the principal species of sea fish, unless authorised by a licence. This Order extends the scope of that prohibition to include fishing for all species of sea fish (other than salmon or migratory trout) in Moroccan waters, in Community waters of ICES Vb (Faroes Grounds), in ICES VI (Rockall and West of Scotland), in ICES VII (Irish Sea, West of Ireland and Porcupine Bank, South Coast of Ireland, Bristol Channel and English Channel), in ICES VIII (Bay of Biscay) and in the United States' exclusive economic zone (articles 3, 4(a) and 5 and Schedule). This Order excepts from the prohibition on fishing— a fishing by any boat used wholly for the purpose of conveying persons wishing to fish for pleasure with rod and line or by handline (article 4(c)); b fishing for salmon or migratory trout (article 4(a)). This Order removes the provision in the principal Order which permitted the retention on board a fishing boat of a quantity of cod, plaice and whiting not exceeding 10% by weight of the total catch of sea fish on board the boat, the fishing for which was for the time being prohibited, caught in ICES VIIa as a by-catch in the course of lawful fishing for another description of sea fish (article 6). In consequence, section 4(9A) of the Sea Fish (Conservation) Act 1967 requires such cod, plaice and whiting to be returned to the sea forthwith. The Order also amends the definition of the Thames and Blackwater coastal area to accord with Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4047/89 fixing, for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, the total allowable catches for 1990 and certain conditions under which they may be fished (OJ No. L389, 30.12.89, p.1, at p.34) (article 4(b)).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.61.
- Basis
- the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
- Confidence
- 0.61 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Sea Fish Licensing (Variation) (No. 2) Order 1990 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Education, social security, pensions and public servicesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1990