UK Offence Report

Penalties and enforcement

regulation 8(1) of The Emulsifiers and Stabilisers in Food Regulations 1989

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 If any person contravenes or fails to comply with any of the foregoing provisions of these Regulations he shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to

a fine not exceeding £2000.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
contravening a requirement of the instrument
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach regulation 8(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Emulsifiers and Stabilisers in Food Regulations 1989, whatever the reason for doing it.
  2. Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
Maximum fine
£2,000
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
22 May 1989
In force from
13 June 1989
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations, which apply to England and Wales only, re-enact with amendments the Emulsifiers and Stabilisers in Food Regulations 1980, as amended, and come into force on 13th June 1989. The amended 1980 Regulations provided in particular for the implementation of Council Directive 74/329/EEC (OJ No. L189, 12.7.74, p.1), as amended by Council Directive 78/612/EEC (OJ No. L197, 22.7.78, p.22) and Council Directive 80/597/EEC (OJ No. L155, 23.6.80, p.23) on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to emulsifiers, stabilisers, thickeners and gelling agents for use in foodstuffs. They also provided for the implementation of Council Directive 78/663/EEC (OJ No. L223, 14.8.78, p.7), as amended by Council Directive 82/504/EEC (OJ No. L230, 5.8.82, p.35) laying down specific criteria of purity for emulsifiers, stabilisers, thickeners and gelling agents for use in foodstuffs, and Council Directive 78/664/EEC (OJ No. L223, 14.8.78, p.30) laying down specific criteria of purity for antioxidants for use in foodstuffs. In addition, these Regulations implement Council Directive 86/102/EEC (OJ No. L88, 3.4.86, p.40), which further amended Council Directive 74/329/EEC. As well as making a minor change in the serial numbers of pectin and amidated pectin, this amending Directive withdrew authority for the use of polyoxyethylene (8) stearate, polyoxyethylene (40) stearate, lactylated fatty acid esters of glycol and propane-1,2-diol, and dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate as emulsifiers and stabilisers in food. Pursuant to Council Directive 74/329/EEC, tartaric acid esters of mono-and di-glycerides of fatty acids (E472(d)) and mixed acetic and tartaric acid esters of mono-and di-glycerides of fatty acids (E472(f)) are added to the list of permitted emulsifiers and stabilisers and specific purity criteria are laid down in Schedule 1. Regulation 4(2) and Schedule 2 Part I prescribe a maximum level for guar gum and locust bean gum in food. Generally, the Regulations– a specify permitted emulsifiers and permitted stabilisers and prescribe purity criteria for those emulsifiers and stabilisers (regulation 2 and Schedule 1); b prohibit the sale and importation of food which contains any added emulsifier or stabiliser other than those prescribed and regulate the sale of food containing permitted emulsifiers and stabilisers (regulation 4 and Schedule 2); c regulate the sale, importation, advertisement and labelling of permitted emulsifiers and permitted stabilisers sold for use as ingredients in the preparation of food (regulations 5 and 6 and Schedule 3); d do not apply to any emulsifier and stabiliser, or to any food having in it or on it any emulsifier or stabiliser, which is intended for export (regulation 3). The Food Chemicals Codex 1981, referred to in regulation 2(1) and Part II of Schedule 1, may be inspected at the Science Reference and Information Service, 25 Southampton Buildings, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1AW (telephone 01-636 1544), or at Liverpool City Libraries, William Brown Street, Liverpool L3 8EW (telephone 051-207 2147). The Food and Nutrition Paper No. 4 (1978) of the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation is available from Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source