Penalties for unauthorised persons sitting or voting.
paragraph 47(1) of SCHEDULE 2 TO THE ORDER of The Montserrat Constitution Order 1989
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Miscellaneous
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 Any person who sits or votes in the Legislative Council knowing or having reasonable grounds for knowing that he is not entitled so to do shall be liable to
a penalty not exceeding two hundred Eastern Caribbean dollars for every day upon which he so sits or votes.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowing that).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowing that.
What would breach paragraph 47(1) of SCHEDULE 2 TO THE ORDER?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person sits or votes in the Legislative Council knowing or having reasonable grounds for knowing that he is not entitled so to do.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Montserrat Constitution Order 1989.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Montserrat Constitution Order 2010
- Made
- 19 December 1989
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order confers a new Constitution on Montserrat. In particular it provides for a Governor appointed by Her Majesty, an Executive Council and a Legislative Council. Provision is also made regarding the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Protection from arbitrary arrest or detentionparagraph 56(1) of SCHEDULE 2 TO THE ORDER
- Protection from arbitrary arrest or detentionparagraph 56(1)(e) of SCHEDULE 2 TO THE ORDER
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.68.
- Basis
- the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.68 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Montserrat Constitution Order 1989 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- MiscellaneousOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1989