False statements
regulation 17 of The Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Summary only
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
17 If any person, for the purposes of obtaining for himself or any other person any grant under these Regulations, knowingly or recklessly makes
a false statement, he shall be liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly, knowingly or recklessly, recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, recklessly, knowingly or recklessly.
What would breach regulation 17?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £2,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (1989-02-20); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 19 February 1989
- In force from
- 20 February 1989
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations implement provisions in Title 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 797/85 (OJ No. L93, 30.3.85, p. 1) on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1760/87 (OJ No. L167, 26.6.87, p. 1) and Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1137/88 (OJ No. L108, 29.4.88, p. 1), and Article 1 of Council Directive No. 75/268/EEC (OJ No. L128, 19.5.75, p.1) on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 797/85. The Regulations, which apply to Great Britain, make provision for aid for agricultural businesses in the form of grants in respect of expenditure of a capital nature incurred in pursuance of approved improvement plans (regulation 9). The works, facilities or transactions eligible for grant and the rates of grant applicable to them are set out (regulation 10 and Schedules 1 and 2). Higher rates of grant may be payable for agricultural businesses in the Isles of Scilly (regulation 10(3) and Schedule 2) or in other less-favoured areas (regulation 10(2) and (7) and Schedule 1) or for businesses carried on by young farmers or by partnerships in which young farmers are partners (regulation 10(4) to (6)). Less-favoured areas are defined by reference to designated maps which are available for inspection during normal office hours at the addresses specified in the definition of designated maps (regulation 2(1)). Copies of the maps may be inspected during normal office hours at any Regional or Divisional Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, at any Divisional Office of the Welsh Office Agriculture Department or at any Area Office of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland. The classes of person and type of agricultural business which may benefit from grant-aid are defined (regulations 3 and 4). To benefit from assistance an applicant must submit an improvement plan for approval by the appropriate Minister (regulation 5). The plan must show that its completion will bring about a lasting and substantial improvement of the situation of the business and its economy, especially the income per labour unit required in carrying on the business (regulation 6(1)). The Regulations also– a impose certain restrictions on approval of improvement plans (regulation 6(2) to (7)); b provide for the variation and withdrawal of plans (regulation 8); c provide for standard costs (regulation 13); d provide for the reduction or withholding of grant in certain circumstances where it would otherwise be payable (regulation 15) and for the recovery of grant paid (regulation 16); e create an offence, punishable on summary conviction with a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (currently £2,000), of knowingly or recklessly making a false statement to obtain grant (regulation 17); f confer rights of entry (regulation 18); g set a closing date of 31st December 1994 for receipt of applications for approval of improvement plans (regulation 7); h set closing dates for receipt of claims for certain grants (regulation 12(2)) and for incurring certain expenditure (regulation 12(3)). Amendments are also made to the Agriculture Improvement Regulations 1985 being earlier Regulations relating to improving agricultural structures. A closing date of 19th February 1989 is introduced for receipt of applications for the approval of an improvement plan under those Regulations which includes only proposed expenditure in the Isles of Scilly relating to any of the items in Schedule 2 to those Regulations (regulation 19(a)(ii)). The provision, installation or replacement of heating systems in durable plastic-clad structures for horticultural produce is now eligible for grant (regulation 19(c)). Plans submitted for approval including proposed expenditure on such heating systems or glasshouse heating systems or heated glasshouses may now also include expenditure on incidental works and plan preparation charges (regulation 19(a)(i)). A minor amendment is also made to the application of the closing date for certain claims in relation to expenditure on incidental works (regulation 19(b)).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Farm And Conservation Grant
Commons · 14 February 1989 · The Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Mr. Richard Ryder)
I beg to move, That the draft Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989, which were laid before this House on 2nd February, be approved. With permission, Mr. Speaker, and since they form a single package, I hope it will be convenient to discuss at the same time the Second motion: That the Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme 1989 (S.I., 1989, No. 128), a copy of which was laid before this House on 2nd February, be…
-
Farm And Conservation Grant
Commons · 14 February 1989
Resolved, That the draft Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989, which were laid before this House on 2nd February, be approved.
-
Business
Lords · 16 February 1989 · Viscount Davidson
My Lords, it may be for the convenience of the House if I announce that the Report stage of the Children Bill will he adjourned at approximately 7 p.m. for approximately one hour and that during this adjournment the Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme 1989 and the Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989 will be taken.
- Farm And Conservation Grant Regulations 1989 Lords · 16 February 1989
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.72.
- Basis
- the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.72 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Farm and Conservation Grant Regulations 1989 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1989