Contravention of The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988
the instrument as a whole of The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
Contravening this instrument is an offence under section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Not determined
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.
What would breach the instrument as a whole?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 26 September 1988
- In force from
- 1 October 1989
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
The Regulations impose duties on employers to protect employees and other persons who may be exposed to substances hazardous to health and also impose certain duties on employees. The terms used in the Regulations, including the term “substance hazardous to health” are defined in regulation 2. By regulation 3 duties are imposed on employers (who for the purposes of these Regulations include self-employed persons) for the protection of their employees and of other persons who may be affected by their work. Regulation 4 prohibits the importation, supply and use at work of specified substances, and also prohibits the use of specified substances in specified processes (Schedule 2). The application of the provisions which relate to the exposure of employees (set out in regulations 6 to 12) is defined by regulation 5. Regulation 6 requires employers to assess the risks to health created by work which is liable to expose their employees to substances hazardous to health and the steps that need to be taken by them to meet the requirements of the Regulations. Regulation 7 imposes a duty on employers to prevent or, where this is not reasonably practicable, adequately to control the exposure to substances hazardous to health of their employees. Where the substance is one for which a maximum exposure limit is specified in Schedule 1, that limit, so far as the inhalation of the substance is concerned, must not be exceeded and the exposure must be reduced so far as is reasonably practicable below it. As respects a substance for which the Health and Safety Commission has approved an occupational exposure standard, control to that standard is to be treated as adequate so far as inhalation of the substance is concerned. Regulation 7 also requires prevention or adequate control to be achieved so far as is reasonably practicable by means other than the use of personal protective equipment and that where adequate control is achieved by the use of respiratory protective equipment, that equipment should be of a type or conform to a standard approved by the Health and Safety Executive. Requirements are imposed by regulation 8 upon employers and employees to make proper use of the control measures provided, and by regulation 9 upon employers for the maintenance of those control measures. The monitoring of exposure to substances hazardous to health is required for the substances and processes specified in Schedule 4 and in any other case where such monitoring is requisite for maintaining adequate control or protecting the health of employees (regulation 10). Regulation 11 requires that, where appropriate for the protection of the health of employees, they must be under health surveillance and in the case of employees who are exposed to one of the substances and engaged in a process specified in Schedule 5 that health surveillance must include medical surveillance by an employment medical adviser or appointed doctor. Regulation 12 requires that employees who may be exposed to substances hazardous to health are given suitable and sufficient information, instruction and training. A person who undertakes fumigations with specified fumigants is required by regulation 13 to notify in advance the persons specified in Schedule 7. Exceptions to this notification requirement are listed in Schedule 6. The regulations provide for exemptions in certain circumstances (regulation 14) and are applied by regulation 15 to certain activities in territorial waters adjacent to Great Britain. Regulation 16 provides for a defence in the case of a contravention of the regulations and regulation 17 for certain transitional provisions. Modifications relating to the Ministry of Defence are introduced by regulation 18. The provisions of the Mines and Quarries Act 1954 (c. 70) and of the Factories Act 1961 (c. 34) which are specified in Schedule 8 are repealed by regulation 19, which also repeals the Hydrogen Cyanide (Fumigation) Act 1937 (c. 45) and revokes or modifies the regulations and orders specified in Schedule 9. This regulation also provides that notwithstanding those revocations, requirements in them for the keeping of any record or register shall remain in force. The Regulations are consistent with the provisions of the Council Directive No. 80/1107/EEC on the protection of workers from the risk related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work (OJ No. L 327, 3.12.80, p.8). Copies of the publications mentioned in the Regulations are obtainable as follows— the approved list (ISBN 0 11 883888 1 revised by ISBN 0 11 8239012) are obtainable from Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. a list of the occupational exposure standards which the Health and Safety Commission has approved is obtainable from the Health and Safety Executive, Baynards House, 1, Chepstow Place, London W2 4TF.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Pesticides
Commons · 31 March 1995 · Mr. Andrew Mackinlay (Thurrock)
This debate relates to the dangers to health caused by the use of lindane, but it also concerns other pesticides in the organochloride and organophosphorus groups which are increasingly used in the home, agriculture and manufacturing. One example to which I shall refer at a later stage is permethrin, which was sprayed on 8 October 1991 in the Grays benefit office where my constituent Cassy Stanton worked. She was…
-
Awe Aldermaston
Commons · 1 March 2000 · Mr. Spellar
If my hon. Friend does not mind, I shall deal with that matter when I deal with individual safety incidents. I stress that we shall insist on retaining the high level of safety standards that is already maintained. We shall be looking to whoever operates the site to act positively to improve current standards. Before I come on to the record of Hunting-BRAE, on which I differ from my hon. Friend the Member for…
-
Royal Parks (Trading) Bill
Commons · 17 May 2000 · Mr. Maclean
I respect those who participate in Esperanto and recently attended a national conference on it in my constituency, but I did not think it appropriate to the new schedule. I was speaking about the part of amendment No. 28 that deals with the proposed new schedule. I consider amendment No. 28 to be terribly important, and I hope that the Minister will be able to reassure me that he will accept some of it in spirit or…
-
Employment Relations Bill
Commons · 14 January 2004 · Rob Marris
Sad to say, my hon. Friend may be right; the Conservatives are being evasive and are not giving us their true agenda. That would be true about many of the policies of the official Opposition. We need to debate the Bill more broadly rather than focusing only on the technicalities, many of which have been covered by hon. Members on both sides of the House, although I shall return to some of them if I have time. We…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.70.
- Basis
- the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
- Confidence
- 0.70 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1988