SCHEDULE 3
SCHEDULE 3 of The Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1975
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Road traffic and vehicles
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
3 A person failing to produce
a driving permit in compliance with this paragraph shall be guilty of an offence which shall be treated for the purposes of section 177 of the Road Traffic Act 1972 and of Part I of Schedule
4 thereto as an offence against the provision specified in column
1 of that Part as section 101(4) and he shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished accordingly. 4
1 A court, on ordering the removal under section 95(1) of the said Act of
a disqualification for holding or obtaining
a driving licence, shall, if it appears that particulars of the disqualification have been forwarded to the Secretary of State under paragraph
2 of this Schedule, cause particulars of the order also to be forwarded to him, and the Secretary of State shall transmit the particulars to the authority who issued the driving permit which the person whose disqualification is removed is shown as holding in the Secretary of State's records.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an authority
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an authority meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach SCHEDULE 3?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1975, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 23 July 1975
- In force from
- 2 August 1975
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
1. The Order gives effect to certain provisions of the following international agreements, namely:— the Convention on Road Traffic of 1949 (Cmd 7997); the Convention on the Taxation of Road Vehicles for Private Use in International Traffic of 1956 (Cmnd 220); the Convention on the Taxation of Road Vehicles engaged in International Passenger Traffic of 1956 (Cmnd 320); the Convention on the Taxation of Road Vehicles engaged in International Goods Transport of 1956 (Cmnd 4206); the Convention on Motor Traffic of 1926 (Cmd 3510); Article IV of the Agreement regarding the Status of Forces of Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty (Cmd 8279); a Decision of the Council of the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation adopted on 28 June 1957, relating to identification marks for hired chauffeur-driven vehicles going abroad from the United Kingdom. 2. The Order re-enacts with amendment and consolidates the Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1957 (S.I. 1957/1074) and the subsequent Orders amending it; and following the transfer to the Secretary of State of functions exercisable in Northern Ireland with respect to vehicle excise duty and the registration of vehicles by the Northern Ireland (Modification of Enactments—No. 1) Order 1973 (S.I. 1973/2163), it revokes and re-enacts with amendment corresponding provisions to those having effect in Great Britain with respect to those matters in Northern Ireland in place of the Northern Ireland Orders revoked thereby. 3. The Order relates to:— the issue of international driving permits to persons going abroad and documents for use outside the United Kingdom with vehicles; driver licensing, vehicle operators' licences and vehicle lighting requirements in relation to vehicles brought temporarily into Great Britain; and registration and exemption from vehicle excise duty of vehicles brought temporarily into the United Kingdom. 4. The principal changes introduced by the Order are that— the fees for international driving permits and certificates for motor vehicles are increased from £1.00 to £1.50 (Schedule 2); vehicles temporarily imported into Northern Ireland by members of visiting forces or the civilian components of such forces are brought within the scope of exemption from vehicle excise duty (Article 5A(2)); vehicles registered in the Isle of Man and temporarily imported into Northern Ireland are exempted from vehicle excise duty (Article 5A(3)) in the manner similarly prescribed for such vehicles temporarily imported into Great Britain (Article 5(3)).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) (Amendment) Order 2013
Lords · 12 November 2013 · The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Baroness Kramer) (LD)
My Lords, the order will allow car transporters to carry out unlimited cabotage operations in Great Britain during the peak registration periods. Road haulage cabotage is domestic goods operations carried out on a temporary basis by haulage operators registered in another EU member state. EU Regulation 1072/2009 revised the previous EU rules governing road haulage cabotage with the intention of clarifying the…
-
Draft Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Order 2019
Commons · 30 January 2019 · Jesse Norman
My right hon. Friend is absolutely right to ask that question—as he can imagine, it was the first question that I and officials asked. It is not possible in law because of the nature of the conventions and the relationships they bear to one another. We are fettered by the way in which the international structure of those conventions works. I would like nothing better than to have a consolidated format that could be…
-
Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Order 2019
Lords · 12 February 2019 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport (Baroness Sugg) (Con)
My Lords, this draft order will be made under the powers conferred by the Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Act 1952 and is needed in all EU exit scenarios—thus differing from many of the SIs we have discussed—as the UK has ratified the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic. The order amends the Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1975, which sets out the powers of the Government to issue…
-
Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting)
Commons · 5 January 2022 · Helen Whately
Clauses 78 and 79 relate to the taxation of heavy goods vehicles. Clause 78 relates to cabotage, which is the transport of goods between two places in the same country by a transport operator from another country for the purposes of hire and reward. Cabotage is restricted both in the UK and abroad. In recent months, shortages of lorry drivers have been associated with problems with the distribution of food and…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Motor Vehicles (International Circulation) Order 1975 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Road traffic and vehiclesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1975