Provision of false etc. information
regulation 32(1) of The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 A person commits an offence if that person, for the purpose of procuring
a particular decision on an application to which these Regulations apply—
a knowingly or recklessly makes
a statement which is false or misleading in
a material particular;
b with intent to deceive, uses any document which is false or misleading in
a material particular; or
c with intent to deceive, withholds any material information.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly, knowingly or recklessly, recklessly, with intent to).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, with intent to, recklessly, knowingly or recklessly.
What would breach regulation 32(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £10,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 11 April 2017
- In force from
- 16 May 2017
- Extent
- S
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke, re-enact and update, the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (“the 2007 Regulations”). These Regulations apply in relation to Scotland only. The Regulations implement Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p.1), as amended by Council Directive 2014/52/EU (OJ L 124, 25.04.2014, p.1), in relation to regulatory approvals required before certain projects may be taken forward in Scotland’s marine environment. The Regulations impose procedural requirements in relation to the consideration of applications for such regulatory approvals by the Scottish Ministers. All projects in schedule 1 require an environmental impact assessment (EIA). Projects in schedule 2 require an EIA if they are likely to have significant effects on the environment. Projects which require an EIA are referred to in the Regulations as “EIA projects”. Regulation 4 prohibits the grant of a regulatory approval for an EIA project unless an environmental impact assessment has been carried out and the Scottish Ministers have first taken account of the environmental information (defined in regulation 2(1)) which is before them. Regulation 26 makes equivalent provision in relation to the determination of an application for multi-stage regulatory approval. Regulation 5 sets out what the environmental assessment process comprises and regulation 6 sets out the content of an EIA report. Part 2 sets out procedures for determining whether environmental impact assessment is required. Regulation 7 sets out which events will establish whether proposed works would be an EIA project. Regulation 8 enables the Scottish Ministers to direct, in certain specified cases, that these Regulations do not apply. Regulation 10 enables a request to be made to the Scottish Ministers for a “screening opinion”. Regulation 9 makes general provision in relation to such an opinion, including that any opinion must be made by reference to the criteria in schedule 3. Part 3 sets out procedures to be followed where the Scottish Ministers are considering an application for regulatory approval for an EIA project without an EIA report. Regulation 14 enables an applicant for a regulatory approval to seek an opinion from the Scottish Ministers (“a scoping opinion”) on the information to be included in an EIA report. The types of information which may be required are set out in schedule 4. The Scottish Ministers must consult bodies with environmental responsibilities before adopting a scoping opinion. Regulation 15 requires consultation bodies, if requested, to assist the preparation of an EIA report by making information available to the developer. Regulation 16 requires publication of notice of the lodging of an EIA report to be given. Regulation 17 requires the EIA report and other relevant information to be publicised. Regulation 18 provides for consultation where an EIA report is received by the Scottish Ministers. Regulations 19 and 20 are concerned with the provision of copies of an EIA report. Regulation 21 contains procedures for requiring the provision by the applicant of supplementary information over and above that contained in the EIA report. The applicant may also submit information relating to the EIA report voluntarily. Such information is together referred to as “additional information” (regulation 2(1)). Regulation 22 provides that notice of the receipt and availability of additional information provided by the applicant after the initial gathering of information for an EIA report has taken place will require to be publicised. Regulation 23 sets out what information is to be contained in the decision notice following determination of an application for regulatory approval. Regulation 24 requires consideration to be given to the inclusion of monitoring measures. Regulation 25 requires the Scottish Ministers to notify the applicant, the consultation bodies and the public of their decision. Part 8 makes provision relating to applications for multi-stage regulatory approvals which essentially mirror the provisions in the Regulations relating to applications for regulatory approval. Regulation 27 requires the Scottish Ministers to seek supplementary information if they identify that the environmental assessment has yet to consider certain significant environmental impacts of the works. Regulation 28 requires the Scottish Ministers to undertake screening in certain circumstances where considering an application for multi-stage regulatory approval. Regulation 29 modifies the application of the Regulations as they apply to applications for multi-stage regulatory approvals. Part 9 makes provision for consultation between EEA States where EIA projects are likely to have significant effects on the environment in another EEA State. Part 10 makes provision for offences. Regulation 32 provides that a person commits an offence if that person knowingly or recklessly provides a false or misleading statement in order to procure a decision or, with intent to deceive, to use a document which is false or misleading or to withhold material information. Regulation 33 provides for how this applies in the context of offences committed by bodies corporate, Scottish partnerships and other unincorporated associations. Part 11 makes miscellaneous provision. Regulations 34, 35 and 36 make provision for the use of electronic communication. Regulation 37 makes provision to facilitate the access to legal challenge procedures for non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection. Regulation 38 provides for co-ordination of assessments. Regulation 39 makes provision for the avoidance of conflicts of interest. Part 12 makes transitional provisions and revokes the 2007 Regulations and relevant amending Regulations.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill
Lords · 16 December 2025 · Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab)
My Lords, this set of amendments relates to the scope and exercise of regulatory powers under the Bill, including the making of regulations. Government Amendments 12, 13 and 14 tabled in my name relate to Clause 18, which was originally included in the Bill to give Scottish Ministers the power to amend the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017 for BBNJ purposes. Following work…
-
Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill
Commons · 2 February 2026 · Seema Malhotra
The hon. Member continues to put on record his concerns. He will know that, as we move forward following ratification, we will continue to have detailed conversations. It is important that the rules and regulations are clear for all to operate by. I was just referring to how we have been moving forward on the Bill to ensure that the devolved Governments are engaged in advance of regulations being made and are able…
Other offences in the same instrument
- Provision of false etc. informationregulation 32(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2017