7 A person commits an offence if the person— a without reasonable excuse— i moves susceptible material in…
article 7 of The Plant Health (Forestry) ( Phytophthora ramorum Management Zone) (Scotland) Order 2014
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
7 A person commits an offence if the person—
a without reasonable excuse—
i moves susceptible material in contravention of article 3(1); or
ii fails to keep
a record of any movement of susceptible material to an approved facility or fails to provide information about such
a movement to an inspector when requested to do so by an inspector, in contravention of article 3(2); or
b intentionally obstructs an inspector in the exercise of powers conferred upon the inspector by article 6.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
7 A person commits an offence if the person— a without reasonable excuse— i moves susceptible material in contravention of article 3(1); or ii fails to keep a record of any movement of susceptible material to an approved facility or fails to provide information about such a movement to an inspector when requested to do so by an in
What would breach article 7?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Plant Health (Forestry) ( Phytophthora ramorum Management Zone) (Scotland) Order 2014.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 2 May 2014
- In force from
- 5 June 2014
- Extent
- S
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order gives plant health inspectors in Scotland additional powers to those conferred on them by the Plant Health (Forestry) (Phytophthora ramorum) (Great Britain) Order 2004 for the purpose of containing within and eradicating from an area within the local government areas of Dumfries and Galloway, East Ayrshire and South Ayrshire (the “management zone”) the tree pest Phytophthora ramorum, Werres, De Cock and Man in ‘t Veld sp. nov.. Article 3(1) prohibits a person from moving susceptible material from within the management zone to outside the zone unless the movement is to an approved facility for the purposes of processing the material. In addition, under article 3(2) records must be kept of the movement of such material and information provided when requested to do so by an inspector. Article 4 makes provision for the approval of facilities. Article 5 makes provision for the suspension and revocation of such approvals. Article 6 provides an inspector with powers to enter premises for the purpose of investigating compliance with article 3. Article 7 provides that a person commits an offence who, without reasonable excuse, moves susceptible material in contravention of article 3(1), fails to keep a record of any such movement, fails to provide this record to an inspector who requests it, in contravention of article 3(2) or intentionally obstructs an inspector in the exercise of powers conferred under article 6. Article 8 makes provision for the commission of offences by corporate bodies. Article 9 specifies the penalties for offences. A map depicting the management zone is also available at www.scotland.forestry.gov.uk and copies may be inspected between 9.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the following offices of the Forestry Commission Scotland— Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT; and Greystone Park, Moffat Road, Dumfries DG1 1NP A copy of the map is provided for illustrative purposes only in Part 2 of Schedule 2. A business and regulatory impact assessment has been prepared and is available at the Forestry Commission Scotland, Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT and online at www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Plant Health (Forestry) ( Phytophthora ramorum Management Zone) (Scotland) Order 2014 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2014