UK Offence Report

Offences by bodies corporate

regulation 13(1) of The Rural Development Support Measures (Control Procedures and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2011 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 Where— a an offence under these Regulations has been committed by a body corporate or a Scottish partnership or other unincorporated association; and b it is proved that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of, or was attributable to any neglect on the part of— i a relevant individual; or ii an individual purporting to act in the capacity of a relevant individual, the individual as well as the body corporate, Scottish partnership or unincorporated association, is guilty of an offence and is liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a body corporate
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a body corporate meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach regulation 13(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Rural Development Support Measures (Control Procedures and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2011.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
26 May 2011
In force from
2 July 2011
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations amend the Agricultural Processing, Marketing and Co-operation Grants (Scotland) Regulations 2008, the Leader Grants (Scotland) Regulations 2008, the Forestry Challenge Funds (Scotland) Regulations 2008 and the Land Managers Skills Development Grants (Scotland) Regulations 2008 (“the relevant Regulations”). The relevant Regulations provide for schemes for the making of grants, and in particular introduced measures to supplement Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (O.J.L27, 21.10.2005, p.1) which lays down general rules governing European support for rural development, financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (O.J. L 329, 16.12.2005, p.40). The relevant Regulations define the “Control Regulation”, Commission Regulation (EC) No1975/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures (O.J. L 368, 23.12.2006, p.74), which was repealed and replaced by Commission Regulation (EU) No65/2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures (O.J.L25, 28.1.2011, p.8). These Regulations substitute the definition of the Control Regulation in the relevant Regulations with a reference to Commission Regulation (EU) No65/2011 (regulations2(2), 3(2)(a), 4(2) and 5(2)) and update a cross-reference to it (regulation 3(3)(a)). These Regulations also ensure clarity in the use of ambulatory references (regulations2(3), 4(3) and 5(3)) and, in the case of the Leader Grants (Scotland) Regulations 2008, ensure that references are made to Commission Regulation(EU) No65/2011 as amended from time to time (regulation3(2)(a)). These Regulations also amend some minor errors in the relevant Regulations. These include the amendment of incorrect cross-references (regulations 3(4) and 4(5) and (6)), some points to clarify the drafting of the relevant Regulations (regulations2(4), (5) and (6), 3(2)(b), (3)(b), (4) and (5), 4(4) and (8) and 5(4) and (5)) and the updating of out of date references to EU legislation (regulation4(7)). A Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source