Amendments to the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Scotland) Regulations 2006
regulation 2(3) of The Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2009
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- TV licensing, fare evasion and school attendance
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
3 For regulation9(1) (control posts), substitute—
1 It is an offence under the Act for any person to operate
a control post unless that post is approved by the Scottish Ministers for that purpose. .
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 2(3)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2009.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing children and young people: definitive guideline
Youth courts and all courts sentencing those under 18 · in force from 1 June 2017
Applies whenever the defendant is under 18, whatever the offence.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 6 October 2009
- In force from
- 13 November 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations amend the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 (“the principal Regulations”). Regulation 2(2) inserts ambulatory references to Council Regulation (EC) No.1/2005 and Council Regulation (EC) No.1255/97 and a definition of “inspector”. Regulation 2(3) amends regulation 9 of the principal Regulations to clarify that the control post must be approved prior to being operated. Regulation 2(4) amends regulation 22(1) of the principal Regulations to clarify that where an inspector considers animals are being transported, or are about to be transported, in a way which contravenes the Regulations or constitutes an offence under the Act, that inspector may serve a notice on a person who is responsible for the animals on a permanent or temporary basis. Regulation 2(5) inserts new provisions 24A and 24B. Regulation 24A provides for the service of notices and other documents under the principal Regulations and regulation 24B inserts provisions setting out an appeals procedure. No Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared as no impact on the private or voluntary sector is foreseen.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.90.
- Basis
- the provision says “it is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.90 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2009 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- TV licensing, fare evasion and school attendanceOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2009