Offences and penalties
regulation 13(1) of The Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2010 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 Any person who —
a contravenes the provisions of regulation 8, 10(3), (4), (6), (7) or (8) or 11(1) or (3);
b intentionally obstructs any person acting in the execution of Regulation 1935/2004, Regulation 2023/2006, Regulation 450/2009 or these Regulations or, without reasonable excuse, fails to provide any assistance or information that person may reasonably require; or
c in purported compliance with any requirement mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), knowingly or recklessly supplies information that is false or misleading in any material particular, is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally, knowingly, knowingly or recklessly, recklessly).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, intentionally, recklessly, knowingly or recklessly; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
ion 2023/2006, Regulation 450/2009 or these Regulations or, without reasonable excuse, fails to provide any assistance or information that person may reasonably require; or c in purported compliance with any requirement mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), knowingly or recklessly supplies information that is false or misleading in any material part
What would breach regulation 13(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2010.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 2 years
in Northern Ireland a reference to a level is construed as referring to the standard scale as it currently stands (Fines and Penalties (NI) Order 1984 art.5(3)), not as it stood when the instrument was made.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 15 September 2010
- In force from
- 20 October 2010
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke the Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2007 (S.R. 2007 No. 434 as amended by S.R. 2009 No. 56 and S.R. 2009 No. 377) (“the 2007 Regulations”) and re-enact, with certain amendments relating to active and intelligent materials and articles, provisions contained in those Regulations. These Regulations provide for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No.1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC (OJ No. L338, 13.11.2004, p.4) (“Regulation 1935/2004”). The Regulations also provide for — a the enforcement of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2023/2006 on good manufacturing practice for materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (OJ No. L384, 29.12.2006, p.75 (“Regulation 2023/2006”); b the implementation of Commission Directive 2007/42/EC relating to materials and articles made of regenerated cellulose film intended to come into contact with foodstuffs (OJ No. L172, 30.6.2007, p.71) (“Directive 2007/42”). This Directive repealed and consolidated Commission Directive 93/10/EEC (OJ No. L93, 17.4.1993, p.27) as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/14/EC (OJ No. L27, 30.1.2004, p.48); and c the enforcement of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 450/2009 on active and intelligent materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (OJ No. L135, 30.5.2009, p.3) (“Regulation 450/2009”). These Regulations provide that references to a specified EU instrument or specified parts of it are to be construed as references to the instrument or parts of it as they may be amended from time to time (regulation 2(3)). These Regulations do not apply to materials or articles outside the scope of Regulation 1935/2004 (regulation 3). The materials identified in that Regulation as being outside its scope are materials and articles supplied as antiques, covering or coating materials forming part of the food and which may be consumed with it and fixed public or private water supply equipment. Part 2 of these Regulations contains provisions which make it an offence to contravene certain requirements of Regulation 1935/2004 (regulation 4), Regulation 2023/2006 (regulation 5) and Regulation 450/2009 (regulation 6). Regulation 1935/2004 is the principal framework Regulation on materials and articles in contact with food. Part 2 also provides for designation of the competent authorities for the various purposes identified in Regulations 1935/2004, 2023/2006 and 450/2009 (regulation 7). Part 3 consists of regulations which re-enact, without amendment, the provisions of the 2007 Regulations relating to vinyl chloride (regulations 8 and 9). Part 4 contains regulations which re-enact, without amendment, provisions of the 2007 Regulations relating to regenerated cellulose film (“RCF”) (regulations 10, 11 and 12). In particular, regulation 10 of these Regulations — a controls what substances may be used in the manufacture of RCF, which may vary according to whether or not it is coated with plastics (paragraph (3)); b regulates what substances may be used to manufacture plastic coatings for RCF, and under what conditions (paragraph (4)); c creates a conditional derogation from paragraph (3) in respect of substances used as colourants or adhesives in the manufacture of non-plastic coated RCF (paragraph (5)); d creates offences in relation to the sale, import or business use of non-compliant RCF (paragraphs (6) & (7)); and e creates a conditional requirement for RCF, when marketed prior to the retail stage, to be accompanied by a declaration of legislative compliance (paragraph (8)). Regulation 11 applies to plastic coated RCF the existing controls (derived from Commission Directive 2002/72/EC) on migration of constituents of plastic materials and articles into food, in particular by — a specifying overall migration limits for plastic coated RCF (paragraphs (1) & (2)); b applying to plastic coated RCF the specific migration limits applicable to certain substances used in the manufacture of plastic materials and articles (paragraphs (3) & (4)); and c applying the prescribed methods and procedures for checking compliance with migration limits (paragraphs (5) & (6)). Regulation 12 contains saving and transitional provisions which — a preserve the defences available under the Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1987 (S.R. 1987 No. 432) for any RCF manufactured before 29th April 1994 that may still be in circulation; and b provide a defence in relation to RCF manufactured in or imported into the European Community before 29th January 2006. Part 5 contains general administrative and enforcement provisions which — a penalise contravention of these Regulations or obstruction of those enforcing them (regulation 13); b designate enforcement authorities for various functions under the Regulations (regulation 14); c provide for the prosecution of a person who causes the commission of an offence by another person, whether or not proceedings are taken against the original offender (regulation 15); d specify a time limit for commencing a prosecution (regulation 16); e provide for a defence of due diligence to an offence under these Regulations (regulation 17); f specify the procedure to be followed when sending a sample for analysis (regulation 18); g make provision for a reference sample to be analysed by the Laboratory of the Government Chemist (regulation 19); h apply certain provisions of the Food Safety (Northern Ireland) Order 1991 for the purposes of these Regulations (regulation 20); i make a consequential amendment to Schedule 1 to the Food Safety (Sampling and Qualifications) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1991 (S.R. 1991 No. 198; relevant amending rule is S.R. 2007 No. 434) (regulation 21); j make a consequential amendment to the Plastic Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009 (S.R. 2009 No. 56) (regulation 22); k amend the definition of “ingredient” in the Food Labelling Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1996 (S.R. 1996 No. 383; relevant amending rule is S.R. 2009 No. 415) (regulation 23); and l revoke the 2007 Regulations (S.R. 2007 No. 434), and the relevant amending Regulations S.R. 2009 No. 377 as well as Regulation 25 of the 2009 Regulations (S.R 2009 No.56) (regulation 24).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Subject to the transitional provisions contained in Article 27 of Regulation 1935/2004, any person who…regulation 4
- Any person who fails to comply with the requirements of Article 4 (conformity with good manufacturing…regulation 5
- Subject to the transitional provisions contained in Article 14 of Regulation 450/2009, any person who…regulation 6
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Materials and Articles in Contact with Food Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2010 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted salesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2010