Obstruction of officers
article 23(1) of The Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 A person is guilty of an offence if—
a he fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed by an officer under the powers conferred by Article
18 or 19;
b without reasonable excuse, he prevents, or attempts to prevent, any other person from complying with any such requirement;
c he assaults an officer while exercising any of the powers conferred by Article 18, 19, or 21; or
d he intentionally obstructs an officer in the exercise of any of those powers.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
1 A person is guilty of an offence if— a he fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed by an officer under the powers conferred by Article 18 or 19; b without reasonable excuse, he prevents, or attempts to prevent, any other person from complying with any such requirement; c he assaults an officer while ex
What would breach article 23(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order (Northern Ireland) 2007.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 18 September 2007
- In force from
- 31 October 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order provides in Northern Ireland and in relation to Northern Ireland fishing boats for the administration and enforcement of the provisions of Annex IIA and IIC (“the Annexes”) to Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 fixing for 2007 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (OJ No L 15, 20.1.2007, p.1) (“the Regulation”). The Order contains provisions which create a management system for days at sea based on monthly entitlements and linked to management periods. Article 3 deals with the establishment of management periods. Article 4 details deeming provisions for certain management areas notified in the first period of 2007. Article 5 contains offences in relation to management periods. Article 6 provides for the calculation of allocation of days for fishing in the Cod Recovery and Sole Recovery Zones which are defined in Article 2 as covering the geographical areas covered by the Annexes. Article 7 provides for the calculation of the allocation of days when a fishing boat is involved in pair trawling. Articles 8 and 9 provide for the adjustment of allocations of days by the Department. Article 10 contains offences in relation to allocations of days and other restrictions on presence in the Cod Recovery and Sole Recovery Zones. Article 11 provides for transfers of days and Article 12 contains an offence of giving false information in a notification made for the purpose of a transfer. Article 13 creates offences in relation to restrictions in both Annexes on the carriage and operation of fishing gears and the combined use of regulated and unregulated gears. Article 14 contains provisions on, and an offence relating to, the maintenance of log-books. Part 3 of the Order makes provision for enforcement. Article 16 deals with penalties and Article 17 provides for the recovery of fines imposed, by a magistrates’ court upon conviction under the Order or any equivalent provision. Articles 18, 19 and 21 confer various powers on British sea-fishery officers including the power to enter premises, to go on board fishing boats, to stop and search vehicles transporting fish and to seize fish and fishing gear. Article 22 provides for the protection of British sea-fishery officers in the exercise of their powers under the Order and Article 23 for an offence of obstructing such officers. Article 24 provides for offences committed by a body corporate, a partnership or an unincorporated association and Article 25 for the admissibility in evidence of logbooks and other documents. Article 26 revokes Article 2 and Parts 2, 3 and 4 of the Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) (Monitoring, Inspection and Surveillance) Order 2006, S.R. 2006/300; the provisions necessary to amend the Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order 2005 (S.R. 2005/350) are retained.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person in charge of a Northern Ireland fishing boat is guilty of an offence if the fishing boat is absent…article 10(5)
- Notwithstanding an allocation of days under Article 6(3) or an equivalent provision, a person in charge of a…article 10(6)
- Notwithstanding the allocation of days under Article 6(4) or an equivalent provision, a person in charge of…article 10(7)
- Notwithstanding the allocation of days under Article 6(5) or an equivalent provision, a person in charge of…article 10(8)
- A person is guilty of an offence if he makes a false declaration in a notification made in respect of a…article 12
- A person in charge of a fishing boat in respect of which point 17 or 18 of the Cod Annex applies, is guilty…article 13(1)
- Subject to the derogation in point 19.2 of the Cod Annex, a person in charge of a fishing boat is guilty of…article 13(3)
- A person in charge of a fishing boat is guilty of an offence if he fails to comply with the requirements in…article 14(1)
- Subject to paragraph (2), a person in charge of a Northern Ireland fishing boat is guilty of an offence if,…article 5(1)
- The person in charge of the boat is guilty of an offence if he fails to comply with paragraph (2)article 9(4)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007