UK Offence Report

Offences relating to regulations 8 and 9

regulation 11 of The Official Feed and Food Controls Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

11 A person who—

a intentionally obstructs

a person exercising powers under paragraph (4)(a), (b) or (c) of regulation 9;

b fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed under paragraph (1) of regulation

8 or paragraph (4)(d) of regulation 9; or

c in purported compliance with such

a requirement furnishes information which he knows to be false or misleading in any material particular or recklessly furnishes information which is false or misleading in any material particular, is guilty of an offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
obstructing an official exercising a power
Fault element
Requires proof of a state of mind
Burden of proof
An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove

The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally, recklessly).

“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).

Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally, recklessly; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).

The defence, as drafted

under paragraph (4)(a), (b) or (c) of regulation 9; b fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed under paragraph (1) of regulation 8 or paragraph (4)(d) of regulation 9; or c in purported compliance with such a requirement furnishes information which he knows to be false or misleading in any material particular or r

What would breach regulation 11?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Official Feed and Food Controls Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006.
  2. Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
  3. Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
10 January 2006
In force from
11 January 2006
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations revoke and re-enact with changes the Official Feed and Food Controls Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005 (S.R. 2005 No. 574). The principal changes are that— the definitions of certain Regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council that are set out in Schedule 1 are updated to take account of certain Commission Regulations that enter into force on and apply from 11th January 2006 and which amend the Regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council or as the case may be affect the way they are to be read; and the references to the Food Hygiene Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005 (S.R. 2005 No. 356) are replaced with references to the Food Hygiene Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 (S.R. 2006 No. 3). These Regulations provide for the execution and enforcement of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ No. L165, 30.4.2004, p. 1) in relation to “relevant feed law” and “relevant food law”, which terms are defined in Schedules 2 and 3 respectively. The revised text of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 is now set out in a Corrigendum (OJ No. L191, 28.5.2004, p. 1). These Regulations also impose prohibitions on the introduction of certain feed and food into Northern Ireland in the light of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ No. L31, 1.2.2002, p. 1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 1642/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ No. L245, 29.9.2003, p. 4) and as read with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ No. L139, 30.4.2004, p. 1; the revised text of that Regulation is now set out in a Corrigendum, OJ No. L226, 25.6.2004, p. 3). These Regulations— provide for the designation of specified bodies as competent authorities for the purposes of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (regulation 3); provide for the exchange and provision of information by competent authorities (regulation 4); enable a competent authority to require a control body to provide information and make records available and provide that a person who— fails to comply with a requirement to provide information or make records available, or in purported compliance with such a requirement furnishes false or misleading information, is guilty of an offence (regulation 5); enable the Department to issue codes of recommended practice to district councils (regulation 6); give the Food Standards Agency the function of monitoring the performance of enforcement authorities in enforcing certain legislation (regulation 7); give the Food Standards Agency the power, for the purpose of carrying out the function referred to in sub-paragraph (e) of this paragraph— to require information to be provided and records to be made available (regulation 8), and to authorise individuals (who may thereby exercise certain powers, including a power of entry) (regulation 9); define certain terms used in regulations 7 to 9 (regulation 10); provide that a person who— obstructs a person exercising a power to enter premises, take samples or inspect and copy records, fails to comply with a requirement to provide information, make records available or provide facilities, records, information or other assistance, or is guilty of an offence (regulation 11); provide a right of appeal in respect of a decision of the competent authority concerning the approval of certain establishments taken under Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (regulations 12 and 13); provide that an authorised officer of a competent authority may take with him a member of staff of the competent authority of another member State for the purpose of conducting an administrative enquiry under Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (regulation 14); provide that when an “enforcing officer”, defined in regulation 15(2), enters premises for the purpose of executing and enforcing official controls he may take with him a Commission expert to enable that expert to carry out functions under Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (regulation 15); provide that a person who enters premises under the powers referred to in sub-paragraph (j) or (k) of this paragraph and discloses any information obtained on the premises with regard to any trade secret is guilty of an offence unless he does so in the performance of his duty (regulation 16); specify the authorities that are responsible for executing and enforcing regulations 5(3), 9(8), 11, 16, 18(8) and 19 (regulation 17); give powers of entry to authorised officers of the authorities referred to in sub-paragraph (m) of this paragraph (regulation 18); create the offence of obstructing an officer acting in the execution of regulation 14, 15 or 18 (regulation 19); provide penalties for offences under Part 2 of these Regulations (regulation 20); provide a time limit for bringing prosecutions for offences under regulation 18(8) (regulation 21); make provision for the execution and enforcement of Part 3 of these Regulations and Articles 15 to 24 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004, together defined in regulation 2(1) as “the Import Provisions” (regulations 23 and 24); provide that the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs are to carry out the functions given to customs services under Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (regulation 25); make provision for the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions to be deferred until a product reaches its destination (regulation 26); in light of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 as read with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 (as described in paragraph 3) prohibit the introduction into Northern Ireland of certain feed and food unless specified conditions are met (regulation 27); provide for the checking of products that are introduced into Northern Ireland (regulation 28); provide that an enforcement authority, first, has the power to do anything that a competent authority may do under Articles 18 to 21 and 24(3) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 and, second, is the competent authority for the purposes of Article 22 of that Regulation (regulation 29); provide for the service of notices by an authorised officer of an enforcement authority when he wishes to take certain measures or exercise certain powers under Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 (imports of feed and food from third countries) (regulation 30); provide a right of appeal in respect of the service of notices under regulation 30 (regulations 31 and 32); enable the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development or the Agency by written declaration to suspend, or impose conditions on, the introduction into Northern Ireland of any product from a third country where it learns or reasonably suspects that any food or feed that has been or may be introduced into Northern Ireland from that third country is likely to constitute a serious risk to animal or public health (regulation 33); provide for charges to be payable in relation to controls carried out on consignments (regulation 34); provide for the procurement and analysis of samples of food for the purposes of the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions (regulations 35 and 36); provide powers of entry for authorised officers of district councils in relation to the execution and enforcement of the Import Provisions (regulation 37); create the offence of obstructing an officer acting in the execution of the Import Provisions (regulation 38); create offences consisting of contravening specified regulations and failing to comply with a notice served under the Import Provisions and provide penalties for offences under Part 3 of these Regulations (regulation 39); provide a time limit for bringing prosecutions for offences under Part 3 of these Regulations (regulation 40); provide that where the commission of an offence under these Regulations is due to the act or default of some other person that other person is guilty of the offence (regulation 41); provide that in proceedings for an offence under these Regulations it is a defence for the accused to prove that he took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence (regulation 42); provide that where an offence under these Regulations which has been committed by a body corporate is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, an officer of the body corporate or a person purporting to act as such he as well as the body corporate is deemed to be guilty of that offence and may be proceeded against and punished accordingly (regulation 43); provide for the protection of officers acting in good faith (regulation 44); and revoke the Official Feed and Food Control Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005 (S.R. 2005 No. 574) (regulation 45).

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source