False statements, forgery and power of seizure in connection with certain documents
article 29(4) of The Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Road traffic and vehicles
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
4 For paragraph (2) substitute– 2 A person who, with intent to deceive– a forges, alters or uses a document or other thing listed in paragraph (2A); or b lends to, or allows to be used by, any other person a document or other thing listed in paragraph (2A); or c makes or has in his possession any document or other thing so closely resembling a document or other thing listed in paragraph (2A) as to be calculated to deceive, is guilty of an offence. 2A The documents or other things referred to in paragraph (2) are– a any licence under the Road Traffic Orders or, in the case of a licence to drive, any counterpart of such a licence; b any counterpart of a Great Britain licence or Community licence; c any international road haulage permit; d any document which, in pursuance of Article 5(3) of this Order, is issued as evidence of the result of a test of competence to drive; e any certificate provided for by regulations under Article 13(3A) of this Order relating to the completion of a training course for motor cyclists; f any certificate of conformity or Department’s approval certificate within the meaning of Part IV of this Order; g any certificate of insurance or certificate of security under Article 92 or 93 of this Order; h any certificate required as a condition of any exception prescribed under Article 23 of the Order of 1995; i any test certificate, goods vehicle test certificate, plating certificate or certificate of temporary exemption within the meaning of Part III of the Order of 1995; j any seal required by regulations made under Article 55 of the Order of 1995 with respect to speed limiters; k any plate containing particulars required to be marked on a vehicle by regulations made under Article 55 of the Order of 1995; l any certificate evidencing the examination of a motor vehicle modified to be propelled using fuel stored under pressure under regulations made under Article 55 of the Order of 1995 m any document evidencing the appointment of an examiner under Article 74 of the Order of 1995; n any notice removing a prohibition under Article 77 (power to prohibit driving of unfit vehicles) or Article 79 (power to prohibit driving of overloaded vehicles) of the Order of 1995; o any records required to be kept by virtue of Article 82 of the Order of 1995; p a certificate of the kind referred to in Article 32B(1) (reduced penalty points for attendance on course) or Article 37(1) (reduced disqualification period for attendance on course) of the Offenders Order; q any document produced as evidence of the passing of an appropriate driving test within the meaning of Article 41 of the Offenders Order; r any document evidencing the passing of an examination (or part of an examination) required by regulations under Article 62 or the successful completion of training provided in accordance with regulations under Article 64 of the Order of 2007; s any certificate under Article 65 of the Order of 2007; t any certificate or other item prescribed under Article 70(1)(a) of the Order of 2007; u any document produced as evidence of insurance in pursuance of Regulation 6 of the European Communities (Motor Vehicles: Compulsory Insurance) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 1973. 2B In paragraph (2A), “Community licence”, “counterpart” and “Great Britain licence” have the same meanings as in Part II. .
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (with intent to).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: with intent to.
What would breach article 29(4)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 21 March 2007
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order amends the law relating to road traffic.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Uk Borders Bill [money]
Commons · 5 February 2007
That the draft Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007, which was laid before this House on 18th December, be approved. —[Mr. Michael Foster.]
-
Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007
Lords · 27 February 2007 · The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Amos)
rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007. The noble Baroness said: The purpose of the order is to reduce road traffic casualties by improving road safety. It allows for stronger penalties and more effective enforcement, bringing the law in Northern Ireland largely into line with that in Great Britain. Many of the provisions…
- Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 Lords · 27 February 2007
- Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 Lords · 7 March 2007
Other offences in the same instrument
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 1SCHEDULE 1
- SCHEDULE 3SCHEDULE 3
- SCHEDULE 3SCHEDULE 3
- SCHEDULE 3SCHEDULE 3
- SCHEDULE 3SCHEDULE 3
- SCHEDULE 3SCHEDULE 3
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Road traffic and vehiclesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007