The Commission’s powers to impose conditions on public protests
article 9A(7) of The Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Summary only
- Courts, police, prisons and the administration of justice
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
7 A person who knowingly fails to comply with
a condition imposed under this section shall be guilty of an offence, but it is
a defence for him to prove that the failure arose—
a from circumstances beyond his control; or
b from something done by direction of
a member of the Police Service of Northern Ireland not below the rank of inspector.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching a condition of a licence, permit or consent
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- Legal burden on the defendant
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly).
The provision gives a defence the defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities. A legal burden of that kind can be read down to a merely evidential one under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 where placing it on the defendant would be disproportionate (R v Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; Sheldrake v DPP [2004] UKHL 43).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly.
The defence, as drafted
posed under this section shall be guilty of an offence, but it is a defence for him to prove that the failure arose— a from circumstances beyond his control; or b from something done by direction of a member of the Police Service of Northern Ireland not below the rank of inspector.
What would breach article 9A(7)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person knowingly fails to comply with a condition imposed under this section.
- Holding a valid licence but doing the thing it allows outside the hours, place or limits its conditions set under the Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005.
- Failing to do something a condition positively requires - a record, a notification, a monitoring step - even though the licensed activity itself is carried on properly.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 6 months
in Northern Ireland a reference to a level is construed as referring to the standard scale as it currently stands (Fines and Penalties (NI) Order 1984 art.5(3)), not as it stood when the instrument was made.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 22 March 2005
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order amends the Public Processions (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 to enable the Parades Commission to impose conditions on persons supporting a public procession; to enable the Commission to issue determinations in respect of protest meetings; to restate the powers of the Secretary of State to prohibit the holding of protest meetings; and to extend section 14 of that Act (breaking up processions) to cover protest meetings.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 Lords · 7 March 2005
-
Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005
Lords · 15 March 2005 · Lord Rogan
I too thank the Lord President the noble Baroness, Lady Amos, for presenting the order before us this afternoon. The noble Lord, Lord Glentoran, said that it gave him cause for concern. It gives me cause for considerable concern. The noble Lord, Lord Smith of Clifton, said that he feared for civil liberties. I have to say that so do I. This Government made an active commitment to strengthening civil liberties with…
-
Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005
Lords · 15 March 2005 · Baroness Amos
rose to move, that the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the draft Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005. The noble Baroness said: This order is one part of a wider package of measures on parades that was announced in a Statement made on 22 February 2005. The statement responded to the reports of Sir George Quigley and the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee on the…
- Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 Lords · 15 March 2005
Other offences in the same instrument
- Secretary of State’s powers to prohibit protest meetingsarticle 11A(7)
- The Commission’s powers to impose conditions on public protestsarticle 9A(8)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Public Processions (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Courts, police, prisons and the administration of justiceOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2005