18 is contravened the owner, occupier or agent of the quarry shall be guilty of an offence.
article 20(6) of The Quarries (Northern Ireland) Order 1983
- In force
- Strict liability
- Miscellaneous
The instrument creating this offence has not been revoked so far as the data shows.
What the provision says
18 is contravened the owner, occupier or agent of the quarry shall be guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an owner
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an owner meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 20(6)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Quarries (Northern Ireland) Order 1983, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- In force
- Made
- 11 February 1983
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- N.I.
How this was established: read from the revised (currently in force) text.
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1988
Lords · 4 July 1988 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office (Lord Lyle) said
My Lords, I beg to move that the House do approve the draft Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1988 which has been laid before it under the Northern Ireland Act 1974. The draft order contains provisions analogous to those enacted in Great Britain by the Sex Discrimination Act 1986. Together with Articles 7 to 10, which replicate changes introduced in Great Britain in 1976 subsequent to the enactment of the…
-
Northern Ireland (Sex Discrimination)
Commons · 5 July 1988 · Ms. Marjorie Mowlam (Redcar)
I thank the Minister for the detailed explanation of the articles in the draft order. I am sure that some of them will be warmly welcomed by people in Northern Ireland, but, clearly, some of them will not. The Minister gave two explanations for the order being introduced. First, he said that it was to bring Northern Ireland legislation into line with that in the rest of the United Kingdom. He referred especially to…
-
Northern Ireland (Sex Discrimination)
Commons · 5 July 1988 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mr. Peter Viggers)
I beg to move, That the draft Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1988, which was laid before this House on 17th May, be approved. The order has several key objectives. The first and most important is to further promote equal opportunities in employment between men and women. The second is to achieve that aim in a manner that reduces unnecessary bureaucracy. The third is to put Northern Ireland on the same…
Other offences in the same instrument
- is contravened the owner, occupier or agent of the quarry shall be guilty of an offence. 7 . . . . . . . . .…article 20
- and 11. . . shall be guilty of an offencearticle 20(1)
- In the event of a contravention of any of the provisions mentioned in paragraph (1), the owner, occupier and…article 20(2)
- In the event of a contravention of any of the provisions mentioned in paragraph (1), the owner, occupier and…article 20(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Quarries (Northern Ireland) Order 1983 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- MiscellaneousOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1983