UK Offence Report

Application of Part to police

article 47A of Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978

The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.

What the provision says

2 In this Article “the relevant officer”

a in relation to

a police officer, means the Chief Constable; b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c in relation to any other person holding the office of constable, means the person who has the direction and control of the body of constables in question. 2A For the purposes of this Part, the relevant officer, as defined by paragraph (2)(a) or (c), shall be treated as

a corporation sole. 2B Where, in

a case in which the relevant officer, as so defined, is guilty of an offence by virtue of this Article, it is proved—

a that the officer-holder personally consented to the commission of the offence,

b that he personally connived in its commission, or

c that the commission of the offence was attributable to personal neglect on his part, the office-holder (as well as the corporation sole) shall be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. 2C In paragraph (2B) “the office-holder”, in relation to the relevant officer, means an individual who, at the time of the consent, connivance or neglect—

a held the office or other position mentioned in paragraph (2) as the office or position of that officer; or

b was for the time being responsible for exercising and performing the powers and duties of that office or position. 2D The provisions mentioned in paragraph (2E) (which impose the same liability for unlawful conduct of constables on persons having their direction or control as would arise if the constables were employees of those persons) do not apply to any liability by virtue of this Part. 2E Those provisions are—

a paragraph 7(1) of Schedule

8 to the Police Act 1997;

b section 27(8) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998;

c section 29(1) of that Act;

d section

28 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Mixed — some elements strict, some not
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove the conduct, and - for those elements the provision qualifies - the state of mind it names. The remaining elements carry no fault requirement, so they are strict.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: the offence itself carries no fault word, but a duty it criminalises by cross-reference uses so far as is reasonably practicable, reasonably practicable; which element that governs was not determined.

What would breach article 47A?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Health and Safety at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Revoked
Revoked by
The Statistics of Trade and Employment (Northern Ireland) Order 1988
Revoked on
24 May 1988
Made
25 July 1978
In force from
Not determined
Extent
N.I.

How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source