UK Offence Report

The Welsh Levy Board Order 2008

Welsh Statutory Instrument 2008 No. 420 — creates 5 criminal offences.

5offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
19 February 2008
In force from
Not determined
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
And section 146A of the Government of Wales Act 1998, Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order creates a new body, the Welsh Levy Board (“the Board”) which has functions and duties relating to the beef, sheep and pig industries in Wales. The Order contains provisions for the constitution and proceedings of the Board. The Board may raise levies relating to each industry (article 6). Details of payment of the levies, and the maximum permitted levy, are set out in Schedule 3. Under that Schedule, failure to make a return relating to a levy is an offence. If demanded by a set number of levy payers, the Board must hold a ballot on whether or not the levy system should continue (articles 11 and 12). There are offences relating to the provision of information to the Welsh Levy Board and record-keeping (article 14). The penalty for breach of the Order is a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (currently £5,000). A full regulatory appraisal of the effect that this instrument will have is available from the Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NW.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source