The Haiti (Sanctions) Regulations 2022
UK Statutory Instrument 2022 No. 1281 — creates 17 criminal offences.
- Made
- 5 December 2022
- In force from
- 28 December 2022
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
- Made under
- Schedule 1 to, the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These Regulations are made under the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (c. 13) to give effect to the United Kingdom’s international obligations resulting from United Nations Security Council Resolution 2653 (2022) imposing a sanctions regime in view of the situation in Haiti. The Regulations provide that those persons designated by the UN as responsible for or complicit in, or having engaged in, directly or indirectly, actions that threaten the peace, security or stability of Haiti are designated for the purposes of these Regulations. Designated persons are subject to various sanctions measures set out in subsequent Parts of the Regulations. Part 3 of the Regulations provides for designated persons to be made subject to financial sanctions, which include having their funds and/or economic resources frozen. Part 4 of the Regulations imposes trade restrictions on military goods and military technology and associated services. The Regulations provide for certain exceptions to this sanctions regime, in particular in relation to financial sanctions (for example to allow for frozen accounts to be credited with interest or other earnings) and also acts done for the purpose of national security or the prevention of serious crime. The Regulations also confer powers on the Treasury to issue licences in respect of activities that would otherwise be prohibited under the financial sanctions. Schedule 2 to these Regulations sets out the purposes pursuant to which the Treasury may issue such licences. The Regulations prescribe powers for the provision and sharing of information to enable the effective implementation and enforcement of the sanctions regime. The Regulations make it a criminal offence to contravene, or circumvent, any of the prohibitions in these Regulations and prescribe the mode of trial and penalties that apply to such offences. They also provide for the application of similar types of provision in the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 to certain offences relating to trade. The Regulations also confer powers on specified maritime enforcement officers to stop and search ships in international and foreign waters for the purpose of enforcing specified trade sanctions and to seize goods found on board ships which are being, or have been, dealt with in contravention, or deemed contravention, of those prohibitions. An Impact Assessment has not been produced for these Regulations. An Impact Assessment was, however, produced for the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 and can be found at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/653271/Sanctions_and_Anti-Money_Laundering_Bill_Impact_Assessment_18102017.pdf.
Offences created by this instrument
- Circumventing etc. prohibitions regulation 13(2) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Supply and delivery of military goods regulation 16(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Making military goods and military technology available regulation 17(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Transfer of military technology regulation 18(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Technical assistance relating to military goods and military technology regulation 19(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Financial services and funds relating to military goods and military technology regulation 20(5) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Brokering services: non-UK activity relating to military goods and military technology regulation 21(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Enabling or facilitating the conduct of armed hostilities regulation 22(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- A person (“P”) commits an offence if P knowingly or recklessly— a provides information that is false in a material… regulation 30(1) · Status not determined · Requires proof of a state of mind
- A person who purports to act under the authority of a Treasury licence but who fails to comply with any condition of… regulation 30(2) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Finance: reporting obligations regulation 31(6) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- A person commits an offence if that person— a without reasonable excuse, refuses or fails within the time and in the… regulation 35(1) · Status not determined · Requires proof of a state of mind
- In the application of paragraph (1) to Scotland, where an offence is committed outside the United Kingdom, any such… regulation 42(2) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Paragraph (2) applies where a person is guilty of an offence under section 68(2) of CEMA in connection with the… regulation 46(1) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Paragraph (4) applies where a person is guilty of an offence under section 170(2) of CEMA in connection with the… regulation 46(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- A person is not to be taken to commit an offence under the Export Control Order 2008 if the person would, in the… regulation 56 · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Asset-freeze in relation to designated persons regulation 8(3) · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.
How Parliament handled it
This instrument became law without a debate or a vote. Under the negative procedure it took effect unless a motion to stop it succeeded, and none was tabled.
- Procedure
- Made negative — law unless a motion to stop it succeeded
- Could either House amend it?
- No. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not. Neither House can change a word of it.
- Committee
- Drawn to the special attention of the Houses by a scrutiny committee
Procedural history
- Instrument created 5 December 2022
- Instrument made (signed into law) 5 December 2022
- Laid before the House of Commons 7 December 2022 · Commons
- Laid before the House of Lords 7 December 2022 · Lords
- Considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) 20 December 2022 · Lords
- No comment by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) 20 December 2022 · Lords
- Instrument comes into force as law 28 December 2022
- Considered by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) 25 January 2023 · Commons, Lords
- Drawn to the special attention of the Houses by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) 25 January 2023 · Commons, Lords
- Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) draws the special attention of both Houses to the instrument on the grounds that it is defectively drafted 25 January 2023 · Commons, Lords
- Objection period ends 2 February 2023
- Instrument remains law 2 February 2023
- Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords 2 February 2023 · Commons, Lords
From Parliament's Statutory Instruments service. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2022