The Channel Tunnel (Arrangements with the Kingdom of the Netherlands) Order 2020
UK Statutory Instrument 2020 No. 916 — creates 3 criminal offences.
- Made
- 27 August 2020
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
- Made under
- Channel Tunnel Act 1987
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
This Order implements into United Kingdom law the provisions of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning Border Controls on Rail Traffic between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom using the Channel Fixed Link. Those provisions (“the international articles”) are by article 3(1) given the force of law in the United Kingdom within, and for the authorised purposes (see article 2(1)) outside, the control zone accorded to the Netherlands by the international articles (“the Netherlands control zone”). Article 3(2) provides that officers from the Netherlands may to the extent specified in the international articles, go about their business (essentially, the operation of Netherlands frontier controls as defined in the international articles) in the United Kingdom. Article 3(3) ensures that those officers can be provided with the necessary facilities. Article 4(1), by extending relevant enactments to the control zone accorded to the United Kingdom in the Netherlands (“the United Kingdom control zone”), performs the corresponding operation for British officers working there. Article 4(2) applies the Equality Act 2010 (c.15) to the carrying out of functions of United Kingdom immigration officers in a control zone in the Netherlands. Article 4(3) and (4) alters the application of the Data Protection Act 2018 (c.12) so that data processed by United Kingdom officers in the Netherlands control zone are, but data processed by officers from the Netherlands in the United Kingdom control zone are not, subject to that Act. Article 5(1) and (2) extends English criminal jurisdiction to conduct in the United Kingdom control zone which, if taking place in England, would constitute an offence under a frontier control enactment as defined in the Schedule. Article 5(6) creates a presumption as to jurisdiction over offences committed where provision is made under the international articles. Article 6 provides that the frontier control enactments (defined in article 2(1)) have effect for the purposes of this Order with the modifications set out in Schedule 4 to the Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1813). Article 7 allows the Secretary of State to charge operators reasonable fees in the tunnel system in relation to their functions under or by virtue of this Order. Article 8 amends article 4 of this Order from IP completion day to take account of changes to data protection provisions arising from the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. The Schedule sets out the international articles and the attached protocol. A full impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no, or no significant, impact on the private, voluntary or public sectors is foreseen.
Offences created by this instrument
- SCHEDULE SCHEDULE · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Application of criminal law article 5(2) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Application of criminal law article 5(2)(b) · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.
How Parliament handled it
This instrument became law without a vote to approve it. A non-fatal motion to object was tabled, which records disapproval without stopping the instrument.
- Procedure
- Made negative — law unless a motion to stop it succeeded
- Could either House amend it?
- No. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not. Neither House can change a word of it.
- Objection motion
- A non-fatal motion to object was tabled — it records disapproval without stopping the instrument
Procedural history
- Instrument created 27 August 2020
- Instrument made (signed into law) 27 August 2020
- Laid before the House of Commons 1 September 2020 · Commons
- Laid before the House of Lords 1 September 2020 · Lords
- Considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) 15 September 2020 · Lords
- Information paragraph provided by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) 15 September 2020 · Lords
- Considered by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) 23 September 2020 · Commons, Lords
- Not drawn to the special attention of the Houses by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) 23 September 2020 · Commons, Lords
- Non-fatal motion (prayer) to object to the instrument tabled 6 October 2020 · Lords
- Objection period ends 10 October 2020
- Instrument remains law 10 October 2020
- Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords 10 October 2020 · Commons, Lords
- Non-fatal motion (prayer) to object to the instrument lapsed at end of session 29 April 2021 · Lords
- Instrument comes into force as law Date not recorded
From Parliament's Statutory Instruments service. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2020