UK Offence Report

The High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) (Greatmoor Railway Sidings Etc.) Order 2018

UK Statutory Instrument 2018 No. 693 — creates 3 criminal offences.

3offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
7 June 2018
In force from
28 June 2018
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
Made under
Transport and Works Act 1992, West Midlands) Act 2017

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order authorises High Speed Two (HS2) Limited to construct railway sidings and associated works adjacent to the Aylesbury Link Railway (also known as the Marylebone to Claydon Junction Line) for the loading and offloading of spoil and waste material to the Calvert Landfill and the Greatmoor Energy from Waste Facility in the District of Aylesbury Vale, County of Buckinghamshire. The works are required in connection with Phase One of the proposed High Speed Railway between London and Birmingham and will replace existing railway sidings and facilities for the transfer of waste located near the village of Calvert also in the District of Aylesbury Vale and currently operated by FCC Waste Services (UK) Limited. In addition to the new railway sidings (Works Nos. 1 to 3) the works include two bridges over the railway sidings (Works Nos. 4 and 6) and an access road (Work No.5). The Order also authorises the compulsory acquisition and temporary use of land for the purposes of the works and confers powers in connection with the construction and operation of the works. A copy of the deposited plans, sections and the book of reference mentioned in the Order and certified in accordance with article 24 of this Order may be inspected free of charge during normal working hours at the offices of High Speed 2 Limited at 5th Floor, Sanctuary Buildings, 20 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BT.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service has no record of this instrument, although it covers the period. Nothing is inferred from that.

Check the source