UK Offence Report

The Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun Freezing Order 2018

UK Statutory Instrument 2018 No. 60 — creates 5 criminal offences.

5offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
19 January 2018
In force from
22 January 2018
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Terrorism, official secrets and national security
Made under
Schedule 3 to the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order is made under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (c.24) to impose a freeze on funds in relation to Andrey Lugovoy (AL) and Dmitri Kovtun (DK). Article 3 provides that a specified person may request the reason why they are specified. Article 4 prohibits any person from making funds available to or for the benefit of AL or DK. It also makes provision prohibiting anyone, including AL and DK, from dealing with funds owned, controlled or held by AL or DK. Article 5 makes it an offence to breach the prohibition on making funds available or to engage in activity knowing or intending that it will enable or facilitate the commission of such an offence, subject to a defence based on no knowledge or reasonable suspicion of the relevant circumstances. Article 6 provides for the Treasury to be able to grant licences to disapply the prohibitions and article 7 makes provision in relation to licensing procedure. Article 8 gives effect to the Schedule which makes provision about information and disclosure of information. Article 9 sets the penalties for offences under the Order, article 10 makes provision relating to criminal proceedings and article 11 relates to offences by bodies corporate and Scottish partnerships. Article 12 makes provision about the service of notices.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

How Parliament handled it

Both Houses had to approve this instrument before it could take effect, and did so.

Procedure
Made affirmative — both Houses had to approve it
Could either House amend it?
No. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not. Neither House can change a word of it.

Procedural history

From Parliament's Statutory Instruments service. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Check the source