UK Offence Report

The Authorisation of Frequency Use for the Provision of Mobile Satellite Services (European Union) Regulations 2010

UK Statutory Instrument 2010 No. 672 — creates 1 criminal offence.

1offences created
0recorded in force
1revoked
Made
8 March 2010
In force from
31 March 2010
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Energy, communications, water and utilities
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations implement in the United Kingdom the European Parliament and Council Decision 626/2008/EC of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (the EU Decision) and the Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (the Commission Decision). Regulation 2 creates a new criminal offence of use of frequency bands 1980 to 2010MHz and 2170 to 2200MHz for the provision of mobile satellite services except under and in accordance with an authorisation granted by OFCOM. Regulation 3 places an obligation on OFCOM to grant an authorisation to each of the selected applicants, as defined in regulation 1 subject to the conditions set out in regulation 4. Regulation 5 requires OFCOM to monitor compliance by the selected applicants of the conditions of their authorisations. OFCOM must also report to the Commission any contravention by either of the selected applicants of any such condition or any enforcement action taken by OFCOM against either of the selected applications. Regulation 5(3) confers a power on OFCOM to require the selected applicants to provide information necessary for OFCOM to carry out their functions under these Regulations. Regulation 6 provides for a notification procedure where OFCOM determine that there has been a contravention by a selected applicant of a condition of its authorisation or a requirement under regulation 5(3) or (4). Regulation 7 gives OFCOM the power to impose a penalty on a selected applicant who has received a notification under regulation 6 where OFCOM are satisfied that that person has failed to comply with its authorisation or the requirement under regulation 5(3) or (4) and has failed to remedy any consequences of the notified contravention. Regulation 8 provides for the amount of penalty which may be imposed by OFCOM under regulation 7, and that penalty may not exceed 10% of the turnover of the notified person’s “relevant business” for the “relevant period”, as defined in regulation 8. Regulation 9 specifies how the turnover of the “relevant business” is to be calculated for the purposes of regulation 8. Regulations 10 to 12 provide that a person affected by a decision of OFCOM under these Regulations, other than decisions taken by OFCOM under regulation 13, may appeal that decision to the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Decisions of the Competition Appeal Tribunal may be appealed on a point of law to the Court of Appeal or the Court of Session in Scotland. Regulation 13 requires OFCOM to exercise their functions under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 so as to give effect to the obligations of the United Kingdom under the EU Decision and the Commission Decision insofar as the implementation of such obligations is not covered by these Regulations. A full Regulatory Impact Assessment and Transposition Note have been produced. Copies may be obtained from Tracey Halsey, Business Relations Directorate (BR2), Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 1 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0ET.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source