UK Offence Report

The Burma (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2009

UK Statutory Instrument 2009 No. 3008 — creates 18 criminal offences.

18offences created
0recorded in force
18revoked
Made
17 November 2009
In force from
19 November 2009
Extent
Not stated
Subject
International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
Made under
Her by section 112 of the Saint Helena Act 1833

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order applies to each of the British overseas territories listed in Schedule 1. It maintains and augments restrictive measures in respect of Burma and the continuing serious violations of human rights in that country and the failure of its military authorities to enter into substantive discussions with the democratic movement concerning a process leading to national reconciliation, respect for human rights and democracy. This Order revokes and replaces the Burma (Restricted Measures) (Overseas Territories Order 2004) (SI 2004/1979) and the Burma (Restricted Measures) (Overseas Territories) (Amendment) Order 2004 (SI 2004/3333), together referred to as “the 2004 Order”. The Order is made under statutory and prerogative powers used to implement autonomous European Union sanctions regimes. The Order gives effect in the overseas territories listed in Schedule 1 to measures adopted by the European Union in Council Common Position 2007/750/CFSP on 19th November 2007 and implemented in Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 adopted on 25th February 2008, which came into force on 10 March 2008, the date of its publication. The measures in the 2004 Order included a prohibition on the supply or export of arms and related material and equipment that might be used for internal repression to Burma, and a prohibition on making available funds, financial assets or economic resources to listed persons and entities and the freezing of their funds, financial assets or economic resources. These measures are maintained in this Order, which also introduces additional measures, in particular by extending the range of goods subject to the export ban to include goods and technology for industries in Burma which provide revenue for the military regime, by extending the list of persons and entities subject to the asset freeze, by prohibiting the import of specified goods originating in Burma, and by expanding the scope of the investment ban. The provisions of the Order include the following. Article 1 provides that the draft Order extends to the same territories as the 2004 Order. Article 2 contains new and revised definitions. In particular, the ban on the supply of relevant goods and technology for Burmese enterprises engaged in specified industries is given effect by an expanded definition of “restricted goods”. A definition of “prohibited imports” is added. The list of persons and entities subject to the asset freeze is extended by re-defining “listed person”, and enterprises subject to the investment ban are re-defined as “listed enterprises”. Article 3 provides for publication by the Governor of a list of listed persons, and the making available of lists of restricted goods, listed enterprises and prohibited imports. Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 repeat the provisions of articles 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the 2004 Order, prohibiting the supply or export of restricted goods, the provision of related assistance, and the use of ships, vehicles or aircraft for carriage of restricted goods to Burma. The transport of prohibited imports from Burma is also prohibited by article 7. Article 8 prohibits the importation, purchase or transfer of prohibited imports which have originated in Burma. Article 9, which requires the assets of listed persons to be frozen, is a reformulation of article 8 of the 2004 Order to accord with current wording in the equivalent Order for the United Kingdom. Article 10, which prohibits making funds available to a listed person, is similar to article 7 of the 2004 Order, but also provides a defence. Article 11 provides an exception by allowing a frozen account to be credited with interest. Article 12 provides offences for circumventing the prohibitions in articles 9 and 10. Article 13 enables the Governor to direct that a person reasonably suspected to be a listed person be treated as if he were, for example when using an alias. This mirrors the provisions in the equivalent UK Order. Article 14 makes provision for licences to authorise exemptions from the asset freeze. Article 15 prohibits the financing of listed enterprises, expanding on the similar prohibition in article 8a of the 2004 Order. The ban on investment is extended to a wider range of listed enterprises. Article 16 prohibits the creation of joint ventures with listed enterprises, their subsidiaries or other persons under their control. Article 17 provides an exception to the offences in article 15 for contracts prior to the first listing of the enterprise. Article 18 provides an exception to the prohibition in article 15(1) for trade contracts. Article 19 repeats article 10 of the 2004 Order, regarding failure by relevant institutions to disclose knowledge or suspicion of listed persons or listed enterprises, or contraventions of the Order. Thereafter, the Order in articles 20 to 30 replicates with minor alterations the general provisions contained in articles 11 to 21 of the 2004 Order. Offences and penalties are added in article 28 to correspond with the additional prohibitions made by the Order. The 2004 Order is revoked by article 31. Schedule 2 is revised to reflect court structures and procedures in the Sovereign Base Areas. Schedule 3 contains a modification of article 28 regarding the application of penalties for the Falkland Islands and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. The list of equipment which might be used for internal repression equipment, contained in Schedule 3 of the 2004 Order, is now under article 3 required to be made available in the Territory. Schedule 4 is revised to reflect provisions regarding evidence and information currently used in such sanctions Orders.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source